This article aims to discuss the enforcement of foreign collective action and settlement judgments in Canada. More specifically, it investigates the enforceability of the decision by the Amsterdam Court of Appeal declaring binding a class settlement in the Ageas case. The development of the Netherlands into a prime venue for (cross-border) collective settlements – including with respect to claimants and defendants residing across the Atlantic – renders a discussion of the enforceability of court decisions pertaining to the collective settlement of disputes of interest from a Dutch, EU and extra-EU perspective
This article outlines the key concerns for Canadians in the prospective Hague Multilateral Judgments...
This chapter reviews Dutch case-law on the privileges and immunities of international organizations ...
Although it is hardly necessary to stress the advantages to international relations and internationa...
This article aims to discuss the enforcement of foreign collective action and settlement judgments i...
This article deals with class, mass and collective action in arbitration under Dutch law. The author...
In the Netherlands, the Law on the Collective Settlement of Mass Damages (WCAM) entered into force i...
Analysis of the legal issues related to the recognition and enforement of feoreign judgments rendere...
textabstractAs far as collective mass claim settlement is concerned, it has been said that ‘the Euro...
The United States has attempted for years to create a more efficient enforcement regime for foreign-...
This article first aims to contribute to an understanding of the Dutch regime for collective redress...
The article examines the conditions and proceedings for the recognition and enforcement judgments an...
With the enactment of the 2005 Collective Settlement of Mass Damage Act (WCAM 2005) the Dutch legal ...
Choice of court agreements are well-established in the private international law of the netherlands ...
This Note examines the intersection of two recent trends in aggregate litigation in the United State...
The Netherlands is internationally known for its collective settlement mechanism that was introduced...
This article outlines the key concerns for Canadians in the prospective Hague Multilateral Judgments...
This chapter reviews Dutch case-law on the privileges and immunities of international organizations ...
Although it is hardly necessary to stress the advantages to international relations and internationa...
This article aims to discuss the enforcement of foreign collective action and settlement judgments i...
This article deals with class, mass and collective action in arbitration under Dutch law. The author...
In the Netherlands, the Law on the Collective Settlement of Mass Damages (WCAM) entered into force i...
Analysis of the legal issues related to the recognition and enforement of feoreign judgments rendere...
textabstractAs far as collective mass claim settlement is concerned, it has been said that ‘the Euro...
The United States has attempted for years to create a more efficient enforcement regime for foreign-...
This article first aims to contribute to an understanding of the Dutch regime for collective redress...
The article examines the conditions and proceedings for the recognition and enforcement judgments an...
With the enactment of the 2005 Collective Settlement of Mass Damage Act (WCAM 2005) the Dutch legal ...
Choice of court agreements are well-established in the private international law of the netherlands ...
This Note examines the intersection of two recent trends in aggregate litigation in the United State...
The Netherlands is internationally known for its collective settlement mechanism that was introduced...
This article outlines the key concerns for Canadians in the prospective Hague Multilateral Judgments...
This chapter reviews Dutch case-law on the privileges and immunities of international organizations ...
Although it is hardly necessary to stress the advantages to international relations and internationa...