RAZUMNI ROK-PRAVNI STANDARD U GRAĐANSKIM SUDSKIM POSTUPCIMA

Cilj ovog rada bio je opisati pojam instituta razumnog roka, njegov razvitak tokom godina, te trenutnu fazu u kojoj se nalazi pravo stranaka da ostvare sadržaj ovog instituta koji im se jamči kako Ustavom Republike Hrvatske, drugim relevantnim nacionalnim zakonima, tako i samom Konvencijom za zaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda. Pitanje njegove kompleksnosti je bila i biti će kamen spoticanja mnogim zakonodavcima i pravosudnim sustavima jer je i sam njegov nastanak u Republici Hrvatskoj bio takav. Od samih početaka i prvog Ustava koji nije poznavao ovaj institut do zadnjih prijedloga o izmjenama zakona o parničnom postupku gdje se pravo na suđenje u razumnom roku ostvaruje u dosada najširem obujmu. Iako možda prespor, trud koji se ulaže da se cijeli sistem unaprijedi i prilagodi potrebama osoba kojima je ta zaštita potrebna ima uzlazni tijek. Stanje u Hrvatskoj se rapidno popravlja, a ključna obveza nadležnih zakonodavaca je nastaviti ovom putanjom, te i dalje donositi propise koji će još više racionalizirati organizaciju sudstva.The aim of this thesis was to describe the term reasonable time, its development over the years and the current phase in which the parties' right to realize the content of this institute is guaranteed to hem by the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia, other relevant national laws and the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The question of its complexity has been and will be a stumbling rock for many legislators and judical systems, because it's very origin in the Republic of Croatia was like that. From the very beginnings and the first Croatian Constitution, which did not recognize this institute, to the latest proposals on changes to the law on civil procedure, where the rights to a trial within a reasonable time is realized in the widest scope so far. Although perhaps too slow, the effort being made to improve the entire system and adapt it to the needs of people who need this protection is on the rise. The situation in Croatia is rapidly improving and the key obligation of the competent legislators is to continue on this path and continue to enact regulations that will further rationalize the organization of the judiciary