No one paying attention needs to be told the verdict on Batson v. Kentucky.' Batson intended to eliminate the influence of race on jury selection, 2 which is essential both to conducting fair and just trials' and to protecting the reputation of the justice system. 4 Batson failed.' A growing collection of empirical studies documents this failure.6 Dozens of articles analyze the reasons for the failure,' and at least one report documents the humiliation suffered when qualified jurors appear for jury service only to be excluded in a situation that appears to be driven by race.8 Many have called for the abolition of peremptory challenges as the only fix.
Historically, peremptory challenges were thought necessary to ensure fair and impartial juries, but ...
The twenty-fifth anniversary of Batson v. Kentucky provides an important moment to reflect on Batson...
The Supreme Court faced an important ideological choice when it banned the racial use of peremptory ...
In Snyder v. Louisiana, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its commitment to rooting out racially discrimi...
While the Supreme Court outlawed discrimination in jury selection over 40 years ago, both empirical ...
Almost thirty years ago, in Batson v. Kentucky, the United States Supreme Court held that prosecutor...
Batson v. Kentucky (1986) aimed to curb racial discrimination in jury selection for criminal trials ...
Among the central issues in scholarship on the American jury is the effect of Batson v. Kentucky (19...
A quarter of a century after the Court’s decision in Batson v. Kentucky, overwhelming evidence demon...
This Article revisits the standard employed to assess the constitutionality of racial classification...
The exercise of peremptory challenges remains the least regulated area of jury selection, largely le...
Research shows the mere presence of Blacks on capital juries--on the rare occasions they are seated-...
It cannot be denied that our jury selection process has lent itself to invidious racial discriminati...
Research shows the mere presence of Blacks on capital juries-- on the rare occasions they are seated...
In 2016, the United States Supreme Court decided that the prosecutors in Foster v. Chatman exercised...
Historically, peremptory challenges were thought necessary to ensure fair and impartial juries, but ...
The twenty-fifth anniversary of Batson v. Kentucky provides an important moment to reflect on Batson...
The Supreme Court faced an important ideological choice when it banned the racial use of peremptory ...
In Snyder v. Louisiana, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its commitment to rooting out racially discrimi...
While the Supreme Court outlawed discrimination in jury selection over 40 years ago, both empirical ...
Almost thirty years ago, in Batson v. Kentucky, the United States Supreme Court held that prosecutor...
Batson v. Kentucky (1986) aimed to curb racial discrimination in jury selection for criminal trials ...
Among the central issues in scholarship on the American jury is the effect of Batson v. Kentucky (19...
A quarter of a century after the Court’s decision in Batson v. Kentucky, overwhelming evidence demon...
This Article revisits the standard employed to assess the constitutionality of racial classification...
The exercise of peremptory challenges remains the least regulated area of jury selection, largely le...
Research shows the mere presence of Blacks on capital juries--on the rare occasions they are seated-...
It cannot be denied that our jury selection process has lent itself to invidious racial discriminati...
Research shows the mere presence of Blacks on capital juries-- on the rare occasions they are seated...
In 2016, the United States Supreme Court decided that the prosecutors in Foster v. Chatman exercised...
Historically, peremptory challenges were thought necessary to ensure fair and impartial juries, but ...
The twenty-fifth anniversary of Batson v. Kentucky provides an important moment to reflect on Batson...
The Supreme Court faced an important ideological choice when it banned the racial use of peremptory ...