Children are Different . . . Sometimes: Science, the Supreme Court, and the Juvenile Brain
- Erika N. Marzorati
DOIAbstract
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
It has been a decade since the Supreme Court made judges the arbiters of scientific validity through...
The U.S. Constitution grants American citizens numerous Due Process rights; but, historically, the S...
Neuroscientific evidence is increasingly being introduced in legal contexts, and neurolaw scholarshi...
The law has long recognized the distinction between adults and children A legally designated age det...
In the last decade, the Supreme Court relied on scientific findings presented in amicus curiae brief...
Over the past twenty years, neuroscientists have discovered that brain maturation continues through ...
This article argues that the Supreme Court\u27s creation of a category of irreparably corrupt juve...
Ideological changes in the cultural conception of children and in strategies of social control durin...
In January 2016, the Supreme Court made a monumental decision, reflecting the notion that juveniles ...
Recent scientific findings about the developing teen brain have both captured public attention and b...
The Supreme Court of the United States has found that youth under the age of 18 are fundamentally di...
Kent v. United States required trial courts to conduct an individualized assessment before transferr...
In several recent Supreme Court decisions, the Court has expanded the protections available to juven...
Longitudinal studies have confirmed that human brains continue to mature and restructure throughout ...
The Supreme Court of Florida ruled in this survey year on two very important cases arising from the ...
It has been a decade since the Supreme Court made judges the arbiters of scientific validity through...
The U.S. Constitution grants American citizens numerous Due Process rights; but, historically, the S...
Neuroscientific evidence is increasingly being introduced in legal contexts, and neurolaw scholarshi...
The law has long recognized the distinction between adults and children A legally designated age det...
In the last decade, the Supreme Court relied on scientific findings presented in amicus curiae brief...
Over the past twenty years, neuroscientists have discovered that brain maturation continues through ...
This article argues that the Supreme Court\u27s creation of a category of irreparably corrupt juve...
Ideological changes in the cultural conception of children and in strategies of social control durin...
In January 2016, the Supreme Court made a monumental decision, reflecting the notion that juveniles ...
Recent scientific findings about the developing teen brain have both captured public attention and b...
The Supreme Court of the United States has found that youth under the age of 18 are fundamentally di...
Kent v. United States required trial courts to conduct an individualized assessment before transferr...
In several recent Supreme Court decisions, the Court has expanded the protections available to juven...
Longitudinal studies have confirmed that human brains continue to mature and restructure throughout ...
The Supreme Court of Florida ruled in this survey year on two very important cases arising from the ...
It has been a decade since the Supreme Court made judges the arbiters of scientific validity through...
The U.S. Constitution grants American citizens numerous Due Process rights; but, historically, the S...
Neuroscientific evidence is increasingly being introduced in legal contexts, and neurolaw scholarshi...
Add to ORKG