Could or Must?: Apprendi’s Application to Indeterminate Sentencing Systems After Alleyne
- David Loudon
DOIAbstract
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
This Article makes valuable new contributions to the burgeoning scholarly discourse on Apprendi v. N...
Before Apprendi , prosecutors using recidivism as a club could, and did, regularly insist that defe...
Two significant developments, legislative and judicial, have taken place in Indiana criminal law in ...
Under Apprendi v. New Jersey, any fact that increases an offender\u27s maximum punishment must be fo...
This article examines the Discretionary Persistent Felony Offender sentencing provision contained in...
In its Apprendi line of cases, the Supreme Court has held that any fact found at sentencing (other t...
Every year hundreds of thousands of convicted criminal defendants are sentenced for their crimes, of...
This article addresses the impact of Alleyne v. United States on statutes that restrict an offender’...
The Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, ___ U.S. ___ (2000), held as a matter of due process that any f...
In Apprendi v. New Jersey, the Supreme Court ruled that any fact that increases the penalty for a cr...
This encyclopedia entry summarizes the pendulum-swings that led the Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New...
This essay offers a menu of procedural alternatives for coping with the potential, some would say in...
This article argues that Blakely v. Washington did not decide (explicitly or implicitly) whether the...
Sixth Amendment--Allocation of Fact-finding in Sentencing.--Apprendi v. New Jersey spawned a series ...
This article traces the fascinating history of early efforts to identify defendants and their prior ...
This Article makes valuable new contributions to the burgeoning scholarly discourse on Apprendi v. N...
Before Apprendi , prosecutors using recidivism as a club could, and did, regularly insist that defe...
Two significant developments, legislative and judicial, have taken place in Indiana criminal law in ...
Under Apprendi v. New Jersey, any fact that increases an offender\u27s maximum punishment must be fo...
This article examines the Discretionary Persistent Felony Offender sentencing provision contained in...
In its Apprendi line of cases, the Supreme Court has held that any fact found at sentencing (other t...
Every year hundreds of thousands of convicted criminal defendants are sentenced for their crimes, of...
This article addresses the impact of Alleyne v. United States on statutes that restrict an offender’...
The Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, ___ U.S. ___ (2000), held as a matter of due process that any f...
In Apprendi v. New Jersey, the Supreme Court ruled that any fact that increases the penalty for a cr...
This encyclopedia entry summarizes the pendulum-swings that led the Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New...
This essay offers a menu of procedural alternatives for coping with the potential, some would say in...
This article argues that Blakely v. Washington did not decide (explicitly or implicitly) whether the...
Sixth Amendment--Allocation of Fact-finding in Sentencing.--Apprendi v. New Jersey spawned a series ...
This article traces the fascinating history of early efforts to identify defendants and their prior ...
This Article makes valuable new contributions to the burgeoning scholarly discourse on Apprendi v. N...
Before Apprendi , prosecutors using recidivism as a club could, and did, regularly insist that defe...
Two significant developments, legislative and judicial, have taken place in Indiana criminal law in ...
Add to ORKG