Although governments have engaged in expression from their inception, only recently have we begun to consider the ways in which the government’s speech sometimes threatens our constitutional rights. In my contribution to this symposium, I seek to show that although the search for constitutional remedies for the government’s harmful expression is challenging, it is far from futile. This search is also increasingly important at a time when the government’s expressive powers continue to grow—along with its willingness to use these powers for disturbing purposes and with troubling consequences. More specifically, in certain circumstances, injunctive relief, declaratory relief, or damages can and should be available to redress the government’s c...
A great deal of scholarly attention is devoted to constitutional rights and comparatively little to ...
States and other governmental bodies increasingly invoke the government speech defense to First Amen...
Governments lie. They do so for many different reasons to a wide range of audiences on a variety of ...
Although governments have engaged in expression from their inception, only recently have we begun to...
This Essay sketches a framework for mapping and navigating the constitutional implications of the go...
The Supreme Court’s emerging government speech doctrine permits the government to refuse to allow ot...
The government speech doctrine permits the government to convey its stance on issues through its act...
But, although the rights of free speech and assembly are fundamental, they are not in their nature a...
This symposium essay explores the legacy of the Supreme Court’s decision in Johanns v. Livestock Mkt...
This essay is about the language used to decide when governments should be held responsible for cons...
Although government entities frequently engage in issue-related campaign speech on a variety of cont...
The government is unique among speakers because of its coercive power, its substantial resources, it...
In 1969, in Brandenburg v Ohio, the United States Supreme Court held that speech tending to promote ...
This symposium paper elaborates on two questions raised by the author’s prior work, Remedial Discret...
The First Amendment tolerates—has long tolerated—the regulation of certain kinds of false speech. In...
A great deal of scholarly attention is devoted to constitutional rights and comparatively little to ...
States and other governmental bodies increasingly invoke the government speech defense to First Amen...
Governments lie. They do so for many different reasons to a wide range of audiences on a variety of ...
Although governments have engaged in expression from their inception, only recently have we begun to...
This Essay sketches a framework for mapping and navigating the constitutional implications of the go...
The Supreme Court’s emerging government speech doctrine permits the government to refuse to allow ot...
The government speech doctrine permits the government to convey its stance on issues through its act...
But, although the rights of free speech and assembly are fundamental, they are not in their nature a...
This symposium essay explores the legacy of the Supreme Court’s decision in Johanns v. Livestock Mkt...
This essay is about the language used to decide when governments should be held responsible for cons...
Although government entities frequently engage in issue-related campaign speech on a variety of cont...
The government is unique among speakers because of its coercive power, its substantial resources, it...
In 1969, in Brandenburg v Ohio, the United States Supreme Court held that speech tending to promote ...
This symposium paper elaborates on two questions raised by the author’s prior work, Remedial Discret...
The First Amendment tolerates—has long tolerated—the regulation of certain kinds of false speech. In...
A great deal of scholarly attention is devoted to constitutional rights and comparatively little to ...
States and other governmental bodies increasingly invoke the government speech defense to First Amen...
Governments lie. They do so for many different reasons to a wide range of audiences on a variety of ...