Laufman v. Oakley Building and Loan Co., 408 F. Supp. 489 (S.D. Ohio 1976) In February of 1976, Federal Judge David S. Porter of the Western Division of the Southern District of Ohio handed down a decision which significantly affects home financing organizations in this country. The ruling in Laufman v. Oakley Building and Loan Co., marked the first federal court decision on redlining, that is, refusal to make mortgage loans on residential property in a racially transitional neighborhood, regardless of the prospective borrower\u27s creditworthiness or the condition of the borrower\u27s property. Judge Porter held that redlining is illegal under the Civil Rights Act of 1968. The purpose of Title VIII of the 1968 Civil Rights Act, better k...
On October 12, 2005, the Southern District of New York ruled that the New York State Attorney Genera...
The constitutionality of certain sections of the National Housing Act that required a community to c...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that the Department of Housing and...
Today, more than three decades after the 1968 Fair Housing Act ( FHA ) banned such behavior, blatant...
With the United States Supreme Court\u27s condemnation of legal segregation in Brown v. Board of Edu...
In 1965 the 106th Ohio General Assembly passed Ohio\u27s first fair housing law effective October 30...
The purpose of this article is to give an overview of federal fair housing laws and their impact on ...
The elimination of racially segregated housing is a national goal of high priority. This goal is ref...
The Supreme Court of the United States has granted standing under section 804(d) of the Fair Housing...
For most of the 20th century, lending discrimination occurred primarily through the denial of credit...
This article addresses the question of whether housing practices that produce discriminatory effects...
Disparate impact liability, a theory for pleading discrimination allegations, has been an important ...
Recent statutory amendments to the Federal Fair Housing Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. Sections 3601 et seq....
The function of this study is to render a legal determination as to whether or not the data develope...
In 1980, the city of Parma, Ohio, Cleveland\u27s largest suburban city was found guilty of violating...
On October 12, 2005, the Southern District of New York ruled that the New York State Attorney Genera...
The constitutionality of certain sections of the National Housing Act that required a community to c...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that the Department of Housing and...
Today, more than three decades after the 1968 Fair Housing Act ( FHA ) banned such behavior, blatant...
With the United States Supreme Court\u27s condemnation of legal segregation in Brown v. Board of Edu...
In 1965 the 106th Ohio General Assembly passed Ohio\u27s first fair housing law effective October 30...
The purpose of this article is to give an overview of federal fair housing laws and their impact on ...
The elimination of racially segregated housing is a national goal of high priority. This goal is ref...
The Supreme Court of the United States has granted standing under section 804(d) of the Fair Housing...
For most of the 20th century, lending discrimination occurred primarily through the denial of credit...
This article addresses the question of whether housing practices that produce discriminatory effects...
Disparate impact liability, a theory for pleading discrimination allegations, has been an important ...
Recent statutory amendments to the Federal Fair Housing Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. Sections 3601 et seq....
The function of this study is to render a legal determination as to whether or not the data develope...
In 1980, the city of Parma, Ohio, Cleveland\u27s largest suburban city was found guilty of violating...
On October 12, 2005, the Southern District of New York ruled that the New York State Attorney Genera...
The constitutionality of certain sections of the National Housing Act that required a community to c...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that the Department of Housing and...