On March 29, 1978, the United States Supreme Court ruled, in City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., that cities could not claim a state action exemption from the federal antitrust laws, absent evidence that the state authorized or directed a given municipality to act as it did. The Court rejected the argument of the cities of Lafayette and Plaquemine, Louisiana, that the 1943 Supreme Court decision of Parker v. Brown, which established an antitrust immunity for states and state mandated activities, applied with equal force to political subdivisions of a state. Rather, the Court concluded that the Parker doctrine exempts only anticompetitive conduct engaged in as an act of government by the state as sovereign, or, by its subd...
This Article analyzes the evolution of Antitrust Law (known as Competition Law in Europe) in United ...
I. Introduction II. The Development and Restriction of State Action Immunity for Cities: The Parker ...
In February 1986 the United States Supreme Court in Fisher v. Berkeley\u27 upheld the validity of a ...
For most of this century, states and municipalities were immune from liability for anticompetitive a...
On January 13, 1982, the United States Supreme Court rendered an opinion against the City of Boulder...
Congress enacted the Local Government Antitrust Act of 1984 in response to outcomes in many well-pub...
This Recent Development first considers the evolution of the Parker doctrine in a variety of context...
Numerous exemptions from the antitrust laws have been recognized to facilitate certain activities wh...
This Article analyzes the state action exemption by examining the case law to which it has given ris...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Community Communications Co. v. City of Boul...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a home rule municipality is not exempt from liability ...
This Article analyzes the likelihood that municipal taxicab regulation may violate federal antitrust...
The past decade has witnessed an historic rejection of state control of markets in eastern Europe. E...
This Article focuses on the application of the state action antitrust inimunity doctrine of Parker v...
This Comment argues that preemption analysis, applied when federal statutes conflict with state or m...
This Article analyzes the evolution of Antitrust Law (known as Competition Law in Europe) in United ...
I. Introduction II. The Development and Restriction of State Action Immunity for Cities: The Parker ...
In February 1986 the United States Supreme Court in Fisher v. Berkeley\u27 upheld the validity of a ...
For most of this century, states and municipalities were immune from liability for anticompetitive a...
On January 13, 1982, the United States Supreme Court rendered an opinion against the City of Boulder...
Congress enacted the Local Government Antitrust Act of 1984 in response to outcomes in many well-pub...
This Recent Development first considers the evolution of the Parker doctrine in a variety of context...
Numerous exemptions from the antitrust laws have been recognized to facilitate certain activities wh...
This Article analyzes the state action exemption by examining the case law to which it has given ris...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Community Communications Co. v. City of Boul...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a home rule municipality is not exempt from liability ...
This Article analyzes the likelihood that municipal taxicab regulation may violate federal antitrust...
The past decade has witnessed an historic rejection of state control of markets in eastern Europe. E...
This Article focuses on the application of the state action antitrust inimunity doctrine of Parker v...
This Comment argues that preemption analysis, applied when federal statutes conflict with state or m...
This Article analyzes the evolution of Antitrust Law (known as Competition Law in Europe) in United ...
I. Introduction II. The Development and Restriction of State Action Immunity for Cities: The Parker ...
In February 1986 the United States Supreme Court in Fisher v. Berkeley\u27 upheld the validity of a ...