The federal Wiretap Act—originally enacted to curtail the government’s unbridled use of wiretaps to monitor telephonic communications—was amended in 1986 to provide a private right of action, extending the Act’s Fourth Amendment-like protections to private intrusions. Since the advent of the internet, plaintiffs have attempted to predicate claims of unauthorized online privacy intrusions on the Wiretap Act. In response, defendants claim they are parties to the communications at issue and should be absolved of liability under the Act’s party exception. The federal circuit courts of appeal disagree on how the party exception applies in the internet context. This Note evaluates the courts’ differing conclusions and rationales and proposes two ...
Real-time information technology facilitates more efficient channels of communication. As communicat...
This note will explain how the different surveillance methods work: wire taps, pen register and trap...
I argue that a person\u27s privacy interest in his email is the same as his privacy interest in a te...
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“Wiretap Act”) prohibits the intentional interception of ...
Criminal use of the Internet to circumvent traditional government phone wiretaps has inspired the Ob...
This article examines the federal Wiretap Act and its application to online communications in light ...
Congress enacted the Wiretap Act in 1968 in an effort to combat organized crime while safeguarding t...
With the expanded use of wiretaps, courts will be faced in the coming years with questions concernin...
The third edition of the seminal “Fishman & McKenna” Wiretapping treatise analyzes federal and state...
This article takes the position that the Wiretap Act and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (...
Modern society is largely dependent on technology, and legal discovery is no longer limited to hard-...
In an effort to remove the disincentives to self-regulation created by the decision in Stratton Oakm...
Between May 2007 and 2010, as part of its popular Street View project, Google collected an enormous ...
Title III of the Federal Wiretap Act, as amended, remains the primary law guarding the privacy of p...
Despite complying with the new amendments to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41, the Federal Bure...
Real-time information technology facilitates more efficient channels of communication. As communicat...
This note will explain how the different surveillance methods work: wire taps, pen register and trap...
I argue that a person\u27s privacy interest in his email is the same as his privacy interest in a te...
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“Wiretap Act”) prohibits the intentional interception of ...
Criminal use of the Internet to circumvent traditional government phone wiretaps has inspired the Ob...
This article examines the federal Wiretap Act and its application to online communications in light ...
Congress enacted the Wiretap Act in 1968 in an effort to combat organized crime while safeguarding t...
With the expanded use of wiretaps, courts will be faced in the coming years with questions concernin...
The third edition of the seminal “Fishman & McKenna” Wiretapping treatise analyzes federal and state...
This article takes the position that the Wiretap Act and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (...
Modern society is largely dependent on technology, and legal discovery is no longer limited to hard-...
In an effort to remove the disincentives to self-regulation created by the decision in Stratton Oakm...
Between May 2007 and 2010, as part of its popular Street View project, Google collected an enormous ...
Title III of the Federal Wiretap Act, as amended, remains the primary law guarding the privacy of p...
Despite complying with the new amendments to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41, the Federal Bure...
Real-time information technology facilitates more efficient channels of communication. As communicat...
This note will explain how the different surveillance methods work: wire taps, pen register and trap...
I argue that a person\u27s privacy interest in his email is the same as his privacy interest in a te...