The Supreme Court\u27s January 2005 decision in Booker should induce Congress to enact legislation to remedy the constitutional invalidity of the MVRA and encourage the Department of Justice to revisit how restitution is charged, indicted, negotiated in plea agreements, proven at trial, and presented at sentencing hearings. The Booker decision is also a reminder to lower federal courts to adhere to the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Hughey v. United States, which limits the reach of orders of restitution. Congress, DOJ, and the federal courts should insist on candor in charging and sentencing to remedy the restitution roulette that has generally accompanied a defendant through the federal sentencing process, a process which violates...
This essay surveys the sentencing issues left open by Rita v. United States and considers how the pr...
It has been nearly ten years since the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in United States v. Booker, ...
This article offers a historically grounded account of the twists and turns in the Supreme Court\u27...
This article explores the question left unanswered by the Supreme Court\u27s January, 2005, decision...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.This article explores the question left unanswe...
United States v. Booker held that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines ( Guidelines ), as they were app...
Criminal restitution is a standard part of sentencing. As criminal restitution obligations have beco...
The much anticipated Supreme Court decision in United States v. Booker and Fanfan has both invalidat...
A new form of restitution has become a core aspect of criminal punishment. Courts now order defendan...
In United States v. Booker, the Supreme Court held that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines are no lon...
This Note examines the inherent conflict among the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, judicial discretio...
In United States v. Booker, a dramatic decision handed down in early 2005, the Supreme Court attempt...
At trial, defendants are afforded a panoply of rights right to counsel, to proof beyond a reasonable...
In United States v. Booker, the Court remedied a constitutional defect in the federal sentencing sch...
The Supreme Court in United States v. Booker held that mandatory application of the United States Se...
This essay surveys the sentencing issues left open by Rita v. United States and considers how the pr...
It has been nearly ten years since the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in United States v. Booker, ...
This article offers a historically grounded account of the twists and turns in the Supreme Court\u27...
This article explores the question left unanswered by the Supreme Court\u27s January, 2005, decision...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.This article explores the question left unanswe...
United States v. Booker held that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines ( Guidelines ), as they were app...
Criminal restitution is a standard part of sentencing. As criminal restitution obligations have beco...
The much anticipated Supreme Court decision in United States v. Booker and Fanfan has both invalidat...
A new form of restitution has become a core aspect of criminal punishment. Courts now order defendan...
In United States v. Booker, the Supreme Court held that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines are no lon...
This Note examines the inherent conflict among the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, judicial discretio...
In United States v. Booker, a dramatic decision handed down in early 2005, the Supreme Court attempt...
At trial, defendants are afforded a panoply of rights right to counsel, to proof beyond a reasonable...
In United States v. Booker, the Court remedied a constitutional defect in the federal sentencing sch...
The Supreme Court in United States v. Booker held that mandatory application of the United States Se...
This essay surveys the sentencing issues left open by Rita v. United States and considers how the pr...
It has been nearly ten years since the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in United States v. Booker, ...
This article offers a historically grounded account of the twists and turns in the Supreme Court\u27...