Legal proof and scientific proof have similarities and differences. Legal proof is a customary affair, while the nature of scientific proof separates it from general custom, and it is a burdensome and methodological affair. Philosophical issues of scientific proof, including induction and transcendence inherent in any description, can penetrate legal cases and turn into seemingly reasonable grounds for suspicions and abuses. Disregarding the nature of proving scientific laws and the difference between a legal claim and a scientific hypothesis can lead to failure in scientific proof. Disregarding the distinction between natural laws and specific observable events in International cases such as beef hormones and EC- biotech was one of the fac...