Testing scenarios are labeled according to the day on which a test was administered to trainees following their arrival. From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers and support staff were exposed to the virus in the community over the course of the 70-day training period. Error bars for outbreak probability indicate 95% Pearson-Clopper confidence intervals.</p
Systematic testing strategies (■, ➕) prevent more infections than random strategies (●, ▲) across al...
Rows show results for different values of test specificity. From left to right, columns show increas...
<p>Probability of outbreak (left y-axes) as a function of day of introduction of CHIKV (x-axes) with...
Testing scenarios are labeled according to the day on which a test was administered to trainees foll...
From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers a...
From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers a...
The starting proportion of compliance was set to the baseline value of 0.3, which linearly increased...
From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers a...
Rows show results for different values of test specificity. From left to right, columns show increas...
From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers a...
From left to right, columns show increases in the proportion immune upon arrival. From top to bottom...
Changes in outbreak probability (top) and outbreak size (bottom) relative to the baseline scenario a...
Left: Distributions of cumulative infections over the 70-day training period across 1,000 replicate ...
From left to right, columns show increases in the proportion of time that individuals comply with fa...
Rows show results for different values of test specificity. From left to right, columns show increas...
Systematic testing strategies (■, ➕) prevent more infections than random strategies (●, ▲) across al...
Rows show results for different values of test specificity. From left to right, columns show increas...
<p>Probability of outbreak (left y-axes) as a function of day of introduction of CHIKV (x-axes) with...
Testing scenarios are labeled according to the day on which a test was administered to trainees foll...
From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers a...
From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers a...
The starting proportion of compliance was set to the baseline value of 0.3, which linearly increased...
From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers a...
Rows show results for different values of test specificity. From left to right, columns show increas...
From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers a...
From left to right, columns show increases in the proportion immune upon arrival. From top to bottom...
Changes in outbreak probability (top) and outbreak size (bottom) relative to the baseline scenario a...
Left: Distributions of cumulative infections over the 70-day training period across 1,000 replicate ...
From left to right, columns show increases in the proportion of time that individuals comply with fa...
Rows show results for different values of test specificity. From left to right, columns show increas...
Systematic testing strategies (■, ➕) prevent more infections than random strategies (●, ▲) across al...
Rows show results for different values of test specificity. From left to right, columns show increas...
<p>Probability of outbreak (left y-axes) as a function of day of introduction of CHIKV (x-axes) with...