Changes in outbreak probability (top) and outbreak size (bottom) relative to the baseline scenario are shown by the width of each bar. From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers and support staff were exposed to the virus in the community over the course of the 70-day training period.</p
Left: Distributions of cumulative infections over the 70-day training period across 1,000 replicate ...
<p>For each of nine simulation scenarios, percentage of outbreak (black) and non-outbreak (gray) cas...
Rows show results for different values of test specificity. From left to right, columns show increas...
From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers a...
From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers a...
Testing scenarios are labeled according to the day on which a test was administered to trainees foll...
From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers a...
Testing scenarios are labeled according to the day on which a test was administered to trainees foll...
Rows show results for different values of test specificity. From left to right, columns show increas...
From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers a...
The starting proportion of compliance was set to the baseline value of 0.3, which linearly increased...
From left to right, columns show increases in the proportion immune upon arrival. From top to bottom...
Rows show results for different values of test specificity. From left to right, columns show increas...
From left to right, columns show increases in the proportion of time that individuals comply with fa...
<p>Univariate sensitivity analysis for <i>E</i><sub><i>V</i></sub> and <i>E</i><sub><i>I</i></sub>. ...
Left: Distributions of cumulative infections over the 70-day training period across 1,000 replicate ...
<p>For each of nine simulation scenarios, percentage of outbreak (black) and non-outbreak (gray) cas...
Rows show results for different values of test specificity. From left to right, columns show increas...
From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers a...
From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers a...
Testing scenarios are labeled according to the day on which a test was administered to trainees foll...
From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers a...
Testing scenarios are labeled according to the day on which a test was administered to trainees foll...
Rows show results for different values of test specificity. From left to right, columns show increas...
From left to right, columns show increases from 0 to 0.01 to 0.10 of the probability that trainers a...
The starting proportion of compliance was set to the baseline value of 0.3, which linearly increased...
From left to right, columns show increases in the proportion immune upon arrival. From top to bottom...
Rows show results for different values of test specificity. From left to right, columns show increas...
From left to right, columns show increases in the proportion of time that individuals comply with fa...
<p>Univariate sensitivity analysis for <i>E</i><sub><i>V</i></sub> and <i>E</i><sub><i>I</i></sub>. ...
Left: Distributions of cumulative infections over the 70-day training period across 1,000 replicate ...
<p>For each of nine simulation scenarios, percentage of outbreak (black) and non-outbreak (gray) cas...
Rows show results for different values of test specificity. From left to right, columns show increas...