Add to ORKGIn lieu of an abstract, below is the essay\u27s first paragraph.Clinicians and forensic psychologists are two types of psychologists who are often required to appear as witnesses in court proceedings. Their roles, duties, and responsibilities in legal issues arc surprisingly different, but it is possible for them to overlap. It is important for psychologists to recognize both the obligations and limitations of their responsibilities when testifying. An important and often unclear question that generally arises is: how can psychologists best fulfill their legal and ethical duties to their clients
The tensions that exist between the roles of the '.psychologist as a behavioral scientist and t...
Legal psychologists’ assessments can have a major impact on the fact finder’s evaluation of evidence...
The current article reflects on the similarities and unique challenges of civil and criminal forensi...
In lieu of an abstract, below is the essay's first paragraph. Clinicians and forensic psycholog...
In lieu of an abstract, below is the essay\u27s first paragraph.Clinicians and forensic psychologist...
The duty to obtain consent from a litigant before beginning a forensic evaluation has fallen to the ...
Comments that many ethical pitfalls may await psychologists who participate as expert witnesses in t...
In review of the existing literature, a discrepancy exists between psychologists providing expert te...
An outline of the background to the provision of psychological evidence within legal settings will b...
In discussing the legal status of the psychologist in the courtroom, the more important but hidden i...
authoritative document making the argument that “explicit ethical precepts ” (p. 50) are violated wh...
Psychologists’ courtroom involvement and testimony should not be dictated solely by what the judge o...
Practicing Psychologists confront a variety of legal and ethical challenges, but those who practice ...
Greenberg & D. W. Shuman, 1997) was to help chart a course for the profession that would raise t...
In her paper Gwen Adshead (2013) identifies the principle of respect for justice as the foundation f...
The tensions that exist between the roles of the '.psychologist as a behavioral scientist and t...
Legal psychologists’ assessments can have a major impact on the fact finder’s evaluation of evidence...
The current article reflects on the similarities and unique challenges of civil and criminal forensi...
In lieu of an abstract, below is the essay's first paragraph. Clinicians and forensic psycholog...
In lieu of an abstract, below is the essay\u27s first paragraph.Clinicians and forensic psychologist...
The duty to obtain consent from a litigant before beginning a forensic evaluation has fallen to the ...
Comments that many ethical pitfalls may await psychologists who participate as expert witnesses in t...
In review of the existing literature, a discrepancy exists between psychologists providing expert te...
An outline of the background to the provision of psychological evidence within legal settings will b...
In discussing the legal status of the psychologist in the courtroom, the more important but hidden i...
authoritative document making the argument that “explicit ethical precepts ” (p. 50) are violated wh...
Psychologists’ courtroom involvement and testimony should not be dictated solely by what the judge o...
Practicing Psychologists confront a variety of legal and ethical challenges, but those who practice ...
Greenberg & D. W. Shuman, 1997) was to help chart a course for the profession that would raise t...
In her paper Gwen Adshead (2013) identifies the principle of respect for justice as the foundation f...
The tensions that exist between the roles of the '.psychologist as a behavioral scientist and t...
Legal psychologists’ assessments can have a major impact on the fact finder’s evaluation of evidence...
The current article reflects on the similarities and unique challenges of civil and criminal forensi...