While the physical picture that emerges is correct, we regret the presence of a bug in the code for the estimation of the aspect ratio of the candidate structures found. In particular, a factor √2 was inadvertently set in the estimation of the thickness, leading to an underestimation of the AR by a factor 1/√2. The revised Tables 3, 4, and 5 with the corrected values of AR are reported in the following, together with the corrected Figure 6. As anticipated the physical picture is the same, with only a slightly different value of the "optimal"AR threshold. The new "optimal"AR threshold is ≃26. In the published article we shared the link to our codes, which will become a tool, namely Unsupervised ML Reconnection, in Python language, in the con...
Change history: In this Letter, the y-axis values in Fig. 3f should go from 4 to -8 (rather than fro...
We have noticed an unfortunate mistake in estimating the total energies of SGR J1935+2154 bursts see...
In the original paper, the wrong plot was used in figure 4. The corrected figure is given below. (Fi...
While the physical picture that emerges is correct, we regret the presence of a bug in the code for ...
PublishedErratumJournalThis is the final version of the article. Available from Oxford University Pr...
This is a correction to: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 478, Issue 2, 1 A...
In our original article,1 there are minor errors in the references and one of the figures. (Figure P...
Erratum to:Vascular networks due to dynamically arrested crystalline ordering of elongated cellsMarg...
An issue has been identified in the simulated samples used to calculate the efficiencies, which affe...
A mistake was discovered in part of the derivation for analytic line shapes of radio recombination l...
The measurement of the differential cross-section as a function of (Formula Presented.) was incorrec...
International audienceThe paper ‘Evidence for an intermediate-mass black hole in the globular cluste...
In the caption to Figure 2, Φ0 is the upward flow across the lower boundary of the simulation, r0, Φ...
PublishedErratumJournalThis is the final version of the article. Available from Oxford University Pr...
The compressed tarballs in this repository contain the binary output data from the SPMHD (smoothed p...
Change history: In this Letter, the y-axis values in Fig. 3f should go from 4 to -8 (rather than fro...
We have noticed an unfortunate mistake in estimating the total energies of SGR J1935+2154 bursts see...
In the original paper, the wrong plot was used in figure 4. The corrected figure is given below. (Fi...
While the physical picture that emerges is correct, we regret the presence of a bug in the code for ...
PublishedErratumJournalThis is the final version of the article. Available from Oxford University Pr...
This is a correction to: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 478, Issue 2, 1 A...
In our original article,1 there are minor errors in the references and one of the figures. (Figure P...
Erratum to:Vascular networks due to dynamically arrested crystalline ordering of elongated cellsMarg...
An issue has been identified in the simulated samples used to calculate the efficiencies, which affe...
A mistake was discovered in part of the derivation for analytic line shapes of radio recombination l...
The measurement of the differential cross-section as a function of (Formula Presented.) was incorrec...
International audienceThe paper ‘Evidence for an intermediate-mass black hole in the globular cluste...
In the caption to Figure 2, Φ0 is the upward flow across the lower boundary of the simulation, r0, Φ...
PublishedErratumJournalThis is the final version of the article. Available from Oxford University Pr...
The compressed tarballs in this repository contain the binary output data from the SPMHD (smoothed p...
Change history: In this Letter, the y-axis values in Fig. 3f should go from 4 to -8 (rather than fro...
We have noticed an unfortunate mistake in estimating the total energies of SGR J1935+2154 bursts see...
In the original paper, the wrong plot was used in figure 4. The corrected figure is given below. (Fi...