The paper aims to discuss the remarks and criticisms that have been raised in the essays discussing my book The Life of Concepts. Hegel, Bachelard, Canguilhem . I focus firstly on the relationship that I establish between conceptual history and epistemology of concepts; then, I consider some purely epistemological criticisms; finally, I focus on the problem of political science and its relationship with the social sciences. In the last section of the paper, I attempt to address the more comprehensive questio n of the role of philosophy and its relationship to sciences
The essay, based also on unpublished writings, analytically reconstructs the Italian debate concerni...
Social epistemology and Political epistemology are two relatively young and recent fields of inquiry...
The text presents remarks on four issues political scientists often take into consideration when ref...
The paper aims to discuss the remarks and criticisms that have been raised in the essays discussing...
The essay focuses on the concept of «political concept» within both the history of con- cepts [Begri...
Taking Pierpaolo Cesaroni’s book La vita dei concetti as a starting point, this paper addresses the ...
Taking Pierpaolo Cesaroni’s book La vita dei concetti as a starting point, this paper addresses the ...
In this article we discuss Pierpaolo Cesaroni’s book The life of concepts. Hegel, Bachelard, Canguil...
In this paper I reply to the objections raised against my book in this symposium. I also get back on...
In this article I reconstruct, discuss, and develop both the understanding of scientific practice an...
The political dimension of science has gained a particular interest in most recent decades for areas...
The book is composed by chapters that discuss the main trends of intellectual history in Europe foll...
The essay, based also on unpublished writings, analytically reconstructs the Italian debate concerni...
I wish to present the reader with some clarifications concerning the essays here pre-sented. They ar...
The essay, based also on unpublished writings, analytically reconstructs the Italian debate concerni...
Social epistemology and Political epistemology are two relatively young and recent fields of inquiry...
The text presents remarks on four issues political scientists often take into consideration when ref...
The paper aims to discuss the remarks and criticisms that have been raised in the essays discussing...
The essay focuses on the concept of «political concept» within both the history of con- cepts [Begri...
Taking Pierpaolo Cesaroni’s book La vita dei concetti as a starting point, this paper addresses the ...
Taking Pierpaolo Cesaroni’s book La vita dei concetti as a starting point, this paper addresses the ...
In this article we discuss Pierpaolo Cesaroni’s book The life of concepts. Hegel, Bachelard, Canguil...
In this paper I reply to the objections raised against my book in this symposium. I also get back on...
In this article I reconstruct, discuss, and develop both the understanding of scientific practice an...
The political dimension of science has gained a particular interest in most recent decades for areas...
The book is composed by chapters that discuss the main trends of intellectual history in Europe foll...
The essay, based also on unpublished writings, analytically reconstructs the Italian debate concerni...
I wish to present the reader with some clarifications concerning the essays here pre-sented. They ar...
The essay, based also on unpublished writings, analytically reconstructs the Italian debate concerni...
Social epistemology and Political epistemology are two relatively young and recent fields of inquiry...
The text presents remarks on four issues political scientists often take into consideration when ref...