Civil liability for intrusion of privacy, honour and reputation

Pravica do zasebnosti ter do časti in dobrega imena je do svobode izražanja v razmerju medsebojnega omejevanja. To pomeni, da se lahko vsako od teh pravic neovirano izvršuje dokler ne pride do trka z nasprotno pravico. V primeru takšnega trka oziroma kolizije med dvema pravicama enakega ranga, je treba določiti, kako se posamezna pravica lahko uresničuje, da ne pride do neupravičenega prikrajšanja. Če nosilca nasprotujočih si pravic glede tega ne moreta najti konsenza, lahko tisti, ki meni da je bil oškodovan, zaprosi za sodno varstvo. Sodišče bo moralo nato ob upoštevanju vseh pomembnih okoliščin primera opraviti nalogo miselnega tehtanja med obema pravicama in odločiti, ali je prišlo do protipravnega posega. Magistrsko diplomsko delo bi se na splošno lahko razdelilo na dva dela, en bolj teoretični in drug bolj praktični. V prvi del sodi analiza ustavnopravnih in materialnopravnih temeljev vseh treh relevantnih pravic (zasebnost, čast in dobro ime ter svoboda izražanja), različni načini pravnega varstva dobrin, ki spadajo v skupino osebnostnih pravic, s poudarkom na odškodninskem, in teoretični pristop do tehtanja med pravicami. Drugi del na kar se da sistematični način prikaže nabor relevantnih okoliščin, ki imajo odločilni vpliv na rezultat tehtanja, s pomočjo resničnih primerov iz domače in tuje sodne prakse. Te kriteriji so do neke mere enotni za posege v zasebnost ter v čast in dobro ime, vseeno pa ima vsaka posamezna dobrina neke svoje specifike. Kot povezovalni element so na začetku predstavljene tudi tri primerjalnopravne ureditve. Delo kot celota preko teoretičnih osnov in praktične nadgradnje prikaže trenuten odnos družbe do zasebnosti ter časti in dobrega imena.The right to privacy and to honour and reputation is in a relationship of mutual limitation with freedom of expression. This means that each of these rights can be exercised unhindered as long as there is no conflict with the opposite right. In the event of such a collision between two rights of the same rank, it is necessary to determine how each right can be exercised so that there is no unjustified deprivation. If the holders of conflicting rights cannot reach a consensus in this regard, the person who believes he has suffered harm can apply for judicial protection. The court will then have to carry out the task of striking a fair balance between the two rights, taking into account all the important circumstances of the case, and decide whether there has been an illegal interference. This master\u27s thesis could generally be divided into two parts, one more theoretical and the other more practical. The first part includes an analysis of the constitutional and international legal foundations of all three relevant rights (privacy, honour, reputation and freedom of expression), different ways of legal protection of interests that belong to the group of personal rights, with an emphasis on compensation, and a theoretical approach to the balancing of rights. The second part presents a set of relevant circumstances that have a decisive influence on the result of the balancing in the most systematic way possible, with the help of real cases from domestic and foreign judicial practice. These criteria are to some extent uniform for interference with privacy, honour and reputation, however, each individual right also has its own specifics. As a connecting element, three comparative legal regulations are presented at the beginning. The work as a whole shows the current attitude of society towards the conflicting rights