Simulation parameters were: prior mean and variance , observation noise variance , temporal cost γ = 0.9. Non-decision time was implicitly zero. and simulation timestep dt = 5 × 10−3. Lines are the mean reaction time for 104 simulations, 95% confidence intervals are shown as red shading (mostly invisible because smaller than the linewidth). (PDF)</p
The effort required to obtain a rewarding outcome is an important factor in decision-making. Describ...
<p><b>A</b>, Two models were fitted to participants’ choice data; the hyperbolic model has previousl...
<p>Discounting functions from three representative subjects obtained by fitting the subjective value...
Simulation parameters were: prior mean and variance , observation noise variance , temporal cost γ ...
Simulation parameters were: prior mean and variance , observation noise variance , temporal cost γ ...
Simulation parameters were: prior mean and variance , observation noise variance , temporal cost c ...
International audienceOptimality analysis of value-based decisions in binary and multi-alternative c...
In the linear time cost (Bayes Risk) case nonlinear subjective utility changes complex time and valu...
Abstract Background Previous research has reported or predicted, on the basis of theoretical and com...
The degree to which real and hypothetical rewards were discounted across delays ranging from 6 hr to...
<p>Each panel shows the difference between the values of the optimal and non-optimal options, as a f...
When humans and other animals make decisions in their natural environments prospective rewards have ...
People tend to discount rewards or losses that occur in the future. Such delay discounting has been ...
<p><b>A</b>, Offered stimuli and choices from Experiment 2 are shown for the participants with the s...
SYNOPSIS. Variance in amount of rewards has been the focus of many studies and models of risk sensit...
The effort required to obtain a rewarding outcome is an important factor in decision-making. Describ...
<p><b>A</b>, Two models were fitted to participants’ choice data; the hyperbolic model has previousl...
<p>Discounting functions from three representative subjects obtained by fitting the subjective value...
Simulation parameters were: prior mean and variance , observation noise variance , temporal cost γ ...
Simulation parameters were: prior mean and variance , observation noise variance , temporal cost γ ...
Simulation parameters were: prior mean and variance , observation noise variance , temporal cost c ...
International audienceOptimality analysis of value-based decisions in binary and multi-alternative c...
In the linear time cost (Bayes Risk) case nonlinear subjective utility changes complex time and valu...
Abstract Background Previous research has reported or predicted, on the basis of theoretical and com...
The degree to which real and hypothetical rewards were discounted across delays ranging from 6 hr to...
<p>Each panel shows the difference between the values of the optimal and non-optimal options, as a f...
When humans and other animals make decisions in their natural environments prospective rewards have ...
People tend to discount rewards or losses that occur in the future. Such delay discounting has been ...
<p><b>A</b>, Offered stimuli and choices from Experiment 2 are shown for the participants with the s...
SYNOPSIS. Variance in amount of rewards has been the focus of many studies and models of risk sensit...
The effort required to obtain a rewarding outcome is an important factor in decision-making. Describ...
<p><b>A</b>, Two models were fitted to participants’ choice data; the hyperbolic model has previousl...
<p>Discounting functions from three representative subjects obtained by fitting the subjective value...