In 1984, Congress enacted Internal Revenue Code section 132 to bring more certainty to the taxation of employee fringe benefits. This article examines the impact of the legislation from the standpoint of administrative pronouncements and taxpayer litigation. The article concludes that section 132 has produced little litigation, but primarily because it has played the role of increasing exclusions. It remains unclear whether section 132 has also contained the growth of new forms of nonstatutory fringe benefits
This recent developments outline discusses, and provides context to understand the significance of, ...
This recent developments outline discusses, and provides context to understand the significance of, ...
Section 7701(o) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) imports the judicial doctrine of e...
In 1984, Congress enacted Internal Revenue Code section 132 to bring more certainty to the taxation ...
The Department of the Treasury has recently issued a discussion draft of the first comprehensive reg...
This article examines Section 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code and the litigation that has cen...
The article presents the issues taxation of employee revenue from the fringe benefits by Personal In...
This recent developments outline discusses, and provides context to understand the significance of, ...
In the early 1980\u27s, Congress faced the mounting problems of tax shelters and other forms of tax ...
This article discusses, and provides context to understand the significance of, the most important j...
The purpose of this article is to introduce some important amendments to the Internal Revenue Code m...
This article analyzes Internal Revenue Code § 162(m), which in general denies public companies a ded...
This recent developments outline discusses, and provides context to understand the significance of, ...
This recent developments outline discusses, and provides context to understand the significance of, ...
Traditional perceptions of tax exceptionalism from administrativ–law doctrines and requirements have...
This recent developments outline discusses, and provides context to understand the significance of, ...
This recent developments outline discusses, and provides context to understand the significance of, ...
Section 7701(o) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) imports the judicial doctrine of e...
In 1984, Congress enacted Internal Revenue Code section 132 to bring more certainty to the taxation ...
The Department of the Treasury has recently issued a discussion draft of the first comprehensive reg...
This article examines Section 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code and the litigation that has cen...
The article presents the issues taxation of employee revenue from the fringe benefits by Personal In...
This recent developments outline discusses, and provides context to understand the significance of, ...
In the early 1980\u27s, Congress faced the mounting problems of tax shelters and other forms of tax ...
This article discusses, and provides context to understand the significance of, the most important j...
The purpose of this article is to introduce some important amendments to the Internal Revenue Code m...
This article analyzes Internal Revenue Code § 162(m), which in general denies public companies a ded...
This recent developments outline discusses, and provides context to understand the significance of, ...
This recent developments outline discusses, and provides context to understand the significance of, ...
Traditional perceptions of tax exceptionalism from administrativ–law doctrines and requirements have...
This recent developments outline discusses, and provides context to understand the significance of, ...
This recent developments outline discusses, and provides context to understand the significance of, ...
Section 7701(o) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) imports the judicial doctrine of e...