The proposed technique efficiency compared to other novel techniques (time in milliseconds).</p
Computational time comparison of five methods on blocks drawn from six data sets (seconds).</p
<p>The comparison of computational efficiency of each algorithm on the test functions.</p
<p>Comparison of our approach and counterpart algorithms in terms of running time (<i>s</i>).</p
<p>Comparison of efficiency of simultaneous detection versus standard technique.</p
Comparison of the proposed method with other conventional methods for throughput of each class.</p
Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p
<p>Comparison of the proposed algorithm with the state of the art methods available in literature.</...
<p>Comparing the performance of the proposed method with other existing methods.</p
Hands-on times for the different molecular techniques considering an average.</p
The comparison of the average running time of the examined methods for 150 experiments executed for ...
<p>Efficiency comparison of proposed method with the method in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/artic...
<p>Each value is the average time in seconds for 10 independent runs.</p><p>Comparison of the comput...
Comparison of the proposed method with other conventional methods for violation rate on the target d...
<p>A comparison between the average processing time of different segmentation methods per image.</p
<p>Comparison of reaction times in milliseconds per experimental condition separated for stimulus mo...
Computational time comparison of five methods on blocks drawn from six data sets (seconds).</p
<p>The comparison of computational efficiency of each algorithm on the test functions.</p
<p>Comparison of our approach and counterpart algorithms in terms of running time (<i>s</i>).</p
<p>Comparison of efficiency of simultaneous detection versus standard technique.</p
Comparison of the proposed method with other conventional methods for throughput of each class.</p
Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p
<p>Comparison of the proposed algorithm with the state of the art methods available in literature.</...
<p>Comparing the performance of the proposed method with other existing methods.</p
Hands-on times for the different molecular techniques considering an average.</p
The comparison of the average running time of the examined methods for 150 experiments executed for ...
<p>Efficiency comparison of proposed method with the method in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/artic...
<p>Each value is the average time in seconds for 10 independent runs.</p><p>Comparison of the comput...
Comparison of the proposed method with other conventional methods for violation rate on the target d...
<p>A comparison between the average processing time of different segmentation methods per image.</p
<p>Comparison of reaction times in milliseconds per experimental condition separated for stimulus mo...
Computational time comparison of five methods on blocks drawn from six data sets (seconds).</p
<p>The comparison of computational efficiency of each algorithm on the test functions.</p
<p>Comparison of our approach and counterpart algorithms in terms of running time (<i>s</i>).</p
DOI
Add to ORKG