CV thresholds of 2.5 were used for Multinomial Logistic Regression and Neural Networks while a threshold of 3.5 was used for all other models. F-beta was calculated as a measure of classification accuracy for the training, validation, and test datasets. Log2 size is log base 2 of the cluster size. Differences between these distributions highlight the effect of overfitting.</p
<p>The tradeoff between overfit and underfit for one of the five cross-validation data splits. Model...
Accuracy scores of multinomial logistic regression, SVM, and neural network with different number of...
<p>The relative measure of model performance, i.e. the per-bin log-likelihood Δ<i>p</i> (see <a href...
The 3.5 CV feature set was used and models produced using default and optimal hyperparameter setting...
To evaluate the performance of classifiers that were trained on a wide range of quantizations, 100 l...
In this paper, we present an evaluation of training size impact on validation accuracy for an optimi...
A count matrix undergoes pre-processing, including normalization and filtering. The data is randomly...
A. Quantification of the effect of COBRA (Constraint-Based Reconstruction and Analysis)—based featur...
The training scores (R2) and cross validation (CV) scores (also R2) are shown. Below 800 training ex...
Validation data are often used to evaluate the performance of a trained neural network and used in t...
The heatmaps show the accuracy of logistic regression models trained on one quantization gray-level ...
Each point indicates a model performance estimate in the training set (X axis) and its gap from the ...
Validation data are often used to evaluate the performance of a trained neural network and used in t...
F-beta was calculated as a measure of classification accuracy. See S1 Table in S1 File for optimal h...
<p>High test and training errors represent underfit (i.e. insufficient model parameters to accuratel...
<p>The tradeoff between overfit and underfit for one of the five cross-validation data splits. Model...
Accuracy scores of multinomial logistic regression, SVM, and neural network with different number of...
<p>The relative measure of model performance, i.e. the per-bin log-likelihood Δ<i>p</i> (see <a href...
The 3.5 CV feature set was used and models produced using default and optimal hyperparameter setting...
To evaluate the performance of classifiers that were trained on a wide range of quantizations, 100 l...
In this paper, we present an evaluation of training size impact on validation accuracy for an optimi...
A count matrix undergoes pre-processing, including normalization and filtering. The data is randomly...
A. Quantification of the effect of COBRA (Constraint-Based Reconstruction and Analysis)—based featur...
The training scores (R2) and cross validation (CV) scores (also R2) are shown. Below 800 training ex...
Validation data are often used to evaluate the performance of a trained neural network and used in t...
The heatmaps show the accuracy of logistic regression models trained on one quantization gray-level ...
Each point indicates a model performance estimate in the training set (X axis) and its gap from the ...
Validation data are often used to evaluate the performance of a trained neural network and used in t...
F-beta was calculated as a measure of classification accuracy. See S1 Table in S1 File for optimal h...
<p>High test and training errors represent underfit (i.e. insufficient model parameters to accuratel...
<p>The tradeoff between overfit and underfit for one of the five cross-validation data splits. Model...
Accuracy scores of multinomial logistic regression, SVM, and neural network with different number of...
<p>The relative measure of model performance, i.e. the per-bin log-likelihood Δ<i>p</i> (see <a href...