Add to ORKGThis article presents a new argument for incorporating a distinction between default and deviant values into the formalism of causal models. The argument is based on considerations about how causal reasoners should represent disagreement over causes, and it is defended against an objection that has been raised against earlier arguments for defaults
In this paper we present a new proposal for defining actual causation, i.e., the problem of deciding...
Interventionism is a theory of causation with a pragmatic goal: to define causal concepts that are u...
Causal theories of action, perception and knowledge are each beset by problems of so-called ‘deviant...
This article presents a new argument for incorporating a distinction between default and deviant val...
course of events. (Menzies 2011: 356) Must causal models distinguish default from deviant events? Mu...
I provide a theory of causation within the causal modeling framework. In contrast to most of its pre...
This paper criticizes some recent arguments by Halpern (2008) and others to the effect that the stru...
Recent literature on causation invokes a distinction between deviant and default behavior to account...
Andreas & Günther have recently proposed a difference-making definition of actual causation. In this...
This article provides a theory of causation in the causal modeling framework. In contrast to most of...
Causal representations are distinguished from non-causal ones by their ability to predict the resul...
Recently, there has been a large amount of support for the idea that causal claims can be sensitive ...
Causal representations are distinguished from non-causal ones by their ability to predict the resul...
In this paper we present a new proposal for defining actual causation, i.e., the problem of deciding...
Interventionism is a theory of causation with a pragmatic goal: to define causal concepts that are u...
Causal theories of action, perception and knowledge are each beset by problems of so-called ‘deviant...
This article presents a new argument for incorporating a distinction between default and deviant val...
course of events. (Menzies 2011: 356) Must causal models distinguish default from deviant events? Mu...
I provide a theory of causation within the causal modeling framework. In contrast to most of its pre...
This paper criticizes some recent arguments by Halpern (2008) and others to the effect that the stru...
Recent literature on causation invokes a distinction between deviant and default behavior to account...
Andreas & Günther have recently proposed a difference-making definition of actual causation. In this...
This article provides a theory of causation in the causal modeling framework. In contrast to most of...
Causal representations are distinguished from non-causal ones by their ability to predict the resul...
Recently, there has been a large amount of support for the idea that causal claims can be sensitive ...
Causal representations are distinguished from non-causal ones by their ability to predict the resul...
In this paper we present a new proposal for defining actual causation, i.e., the problem of deciding...
Interventionism is a theory of causation with a pragmatic goal: to define causal concepts that are u...
Causal theories of action, perception and knowledge are each beset by problems of so-called ‘deviant...