In an often-forgotten proclamation during an autobiographical interview in 1995, Thomas Kuhn notes, without much explanation, his indebtedness to psychoanalysis. While in the wake of Kuhn's 1962 publication The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, many psychoanalytic scholars have made use of his work to justify shifts in psychoanalytic traditions, few have attempted to point out the relation between Kuhnian science and the psychoanalytic process. This article argues that there is a strong affinity between the developmental and structural themes of Kuhn’s scientific revolutions with that of the psychic restructuring that occurs in the psychoanalytic process. Furthermore, these affinities represent the lasting effects that psychoanalysis had...
Why, despite his enormous influence in the latter part of the twentieth century, has Kuhn left no di...
I first read The Structure of Scientific Revolutions in the fall of ’67 at Princeton as a freshman d...
Few recent works have generated as much intellectual discussion as Thomas S. Kuhn\u27s The Structure...
In an often-forgotten proclamation during an autobiographical interview in 1995, Thomas Kuhn notes, ...
Thomas S. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions was a watershed event when it was published...
En 1962 paraissait La Structure des révolutions scientifiques, l'ouvrage qui a rendu célèbre l'histo...
Kuhn�s interests led him from the history of science to epistemology and, passing through psychology...
Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996) is widely considered as one of the most important philosophers of science of...
This article takes issue with Kuhn’s description of the ‘Aristotle experience,’ an event that took p...
Taubert NC. Richards, Robert J.; Daston, Lorraine (Hrsg.): Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolution...
Moti Mizrahi has argued that Thomas Kuhn does not have a good argument for the incommensurability of...
In 1962, the publication of Thomas Kuhn’s Structure ‘revolutionized’ the way one conducts philosophi...
This is a book review of Vasso Kindi and Theodore Arabatzis (Eds.), Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientif...
After the publication of The structure of scientific revolutions, Kuhn attempted to fend off accusat...
In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas Kuhn resorts to concepts from several disciplines...
Why, despite his enormous influence in the latter part of the twentieth century, has Kuhn left no di...
I first read The Structure of Scientific Revolutions in the fall of ’67 at Princeton as a freshman d...
Few recent works have generated as much intellectual discussion as Thomas S. Kuhn\u27s The Structure...
In an often-forgotten proclamation during an autobiographical interview in 1995, Thomas Kuhn notes, ...
Thomas S. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions was a watershed event when it was published...
En 1962 paraissait La Structure des révolutions scientifiques, l'ouvrage qui a rendu célèbre l'histo...
Kuhn�s interests led him from the history of science to epistemology and, passing through psychology...
Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996) is widely considered as one of the most important philosophers of science of...
This article takes issue with Kuhn’s description of the ‘Aristotle experience,’ an event that took p...
Taubert NC. Richards, Robert J.; Daston, Lorraine (Hrsg.): Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolution...
Moti Mizrahi has argued that Thomas Kuhn does not have a good argument for the incommensurability of...
In 1962, the publication of Thomas Kuhn’s Structure ‘revolutionized’ the way one conducts philosophi...
This is a book review of Vasso Kindi and Theodore Arabatzis (Eds.), Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientif...
After the publication of The structure of scientific revolutions, Kuhn attempted to fend off accusat...
In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas Kuhn resorts to concepts from several disciplines...
Why, despite his enormous influence in the latter part of the twentieth century, has Kuhn left no di...
I first read The Structure of Scientific Revolutions in the fall of ’67 at Princeton as a freshman d...
Few recent works have generated as much intellectual discussion as Thomas S. Kuhn\u27s The Structure...
Add to ORKG