The claim that historians “write from a present-day perspective” does not entail that the past only matters when interpreted by categories of social justice. The past is a set of amorphous events and people, including their actions and motives. So, historians are free to explore various aspects of it to offer meaningful and compelling interpretations without necessarily privileging one category. The past is richer than we can humanely understand. Hence, it is important that new generations of scholars revise it from different angles and without ideological restrictions
In this paper, I show how the phenomenological and hermeneutic traditions and method converge on the...
The article interprets that it is hardly surprising then that philosophers of history point to the s...
3.2 Historical objectivity Another issue that provoked significant attention among analytic philosop...
The claim that historians “write from a present-day perspective” does not entail that the past only ...
Modernity investigates and explains the past, according to its standards and expectations. Historian...
The yearning for historical justice has become a defining feature of our age. The article discusses ...
[Extract] The nature of history and its credentials as a discipline have long attracted sophisticate...
What place does ‘presentism’ have in modern historical scholarship? Can students of the past avoid ...
The historical profession is not noted for examining its own methodologies. Indeed, most historians ...
Beneath its calm tone, Prof. Benedict’s long, thoughtful, and at times quite sympathetic review of ...
Historians make practically no use of new intellectual tools from the social sciences that are revol...
Is historical scholarship compatible with commitment to social values? Do professional historians ha...
Does Current Events make history? Is it possible a history out of Current Events? What does it mean ...
Debates about history have never been strictly confined to the world of scholarship. They have also ...
© W. S. Maney & Son Ltd 2015 Central to this essay is the debate about the ultimate purpose of stu...
In this paper, I show how the phenomenological and hermeneutic traditions and method converge on the...
The article interprets that it is hardly surprising then that philosophers of history point to the s...
3.2 Historical objectivity Another issue that provoked significant attention among analytic philosop...
The claim that historians “write from a present-day perspective” does not entail that the past only ...
Modernity investigates and explains the past, according to its standards and expectations. Historian...
The yearning for historical justice has become a defining feature of our age. The article discusses ...
[Extract] The nature of history and its credentials as a discipline have long attracted sophisticate...
What place does ‘presentism’ have in modern historical scholarship? Can students of the past avoid ...
The historical profession is not noted for examining its own methodologies. Indeed, most historians ...
Beneath its calm tone, Prof. Benedict’s long, thoughtful, and at times quite sympathetic review of ...
Historians make practically no use of new intellectual tools from the social sciences that are revol...
Is historical scholarship compatible with commitment to social values? Do professional historians ha...
Does Current Events make history? Is it possible a history out of Current Events? What does it mean ...
Debates about history have never been strictly confined to the world of scholarship. They have also ...
© W. S. Maney & Son Ltd 2015 Central to this essay is the debate about the ultimate purpose of stu...
In this paper, I show how the phenomenological and hermeneutic traditions and method converge on the...
The article interprets that it is hardly surprising then that philosophers of history point to the s...
3.2 Historical objectivity Another issue that provoked significant attention among analytic philosop...