Add to ORKGExtensive revising is required by many journals in the social sciences. It is expected that authors “revise and resubmit” (R&R) their manuscripts several times before they are accepted for publication, a process that is time consuming, demoralising, and stifling of creativity. In this post, Christine L. Williams discusses the potential benefits and drawbacks of abolishing the R&R as an option for journal editors
Improving scientific publishing is often framed as an issue of openness and speed and less often as ...
Professor Fleur Johns offers 10 rules of thumb that have guided her own reviewing efforts and may pr...
AI is forecast to become increasingly central to many aspects of life and work. The same trends can ...
The peer review process has been subjected to a steady stream of criticism in recent years. This has...
Review papers play a significant role in curating the scholarly record. Drawing on a study of close ...
Think of a research journal and you may imagine a well-thumbed notebook replete with insightful entr...
It has become increasingly clear that prevailing academic incentive structures have a potentially da...
The current review system for many academic articles is flawed, hindering the publication of excelle...
The literature review is a staple of the scholarly article. It allows authors to summarise previous ...
Open Access initiatives promise to extend access to scholarly conversations. However, the dominant m...
In this feature essay, David Beer argues that reviewing allows us to put collective knowledge ahead ...
In The New Despotism, John Keane revives this term to examine how the ‘new despotism’ functions toda...
Historically the single authored paper has been a mainstay of social scientific and humanistic resea...
April 2003 JOE describes two topic clusters that distinguish this month\u27s issue. Hearing Abou...
The phrase ‘publish or perish’ suggests that the purpose of academic writing is in and of itself to ...
Improving scientific publishing is often framed as an issue of openness and speed and less often as ...
Professor Fleur Johns offers 10 rules of thumb that have guided her own reviewing efforts and may pr...
AI is forecast to become increasingly central to many aspects of life and work. The same trends can ...
The peer review process has been subjected to a steady stream of criticism in recent years. This has...
Review papers play a significant role in curating the scholarly record. Drawing on a study of close ...
Think of a research journal and you may imagine a well-thumbed notebook replete with insightful entr...
It has become increasingly clear that prevailing academic incentive structures have a potentially da...
The current review system for many academic articles is flawed, hindering the publication of excelle...
The literature review is a staple of the scholarly article. It allows authors to summarise previous ...
Open Access initiatives promise to extend access to scholarly conversations. However, the dominant m...
In this feature essay, David Beer argues that reviewing allows us to put collective knowledge ahead ...
In The New Despotism, John Keane revives this term to examine how the ‘new despotism’ functions toda...
Historically the single authored paper has been a mainstay of social scientific and humanistic resea...
April 2003 JOE describes two topic clusters that distinguish this month\u27s issue. Hearing Abou...
The phrase ‘publish or perish’ suggests that the purpose of academic writing is in and of itself to ...
Improving scientific publishing is often framed as an issue of openness and speed and less often as ...
Professor Fleur Johns offers 10 rules of thumb that have guided her own reviewing efforts and may pr...
AI is forecast to become increasingly central to many aspects of life and work. The same trends can ...