Coefficient estimates and 95% confidence intervals from linear mixed-effects models (Gaussian response) relating percent cover of four vegetation groups to retention treatment and cover type (patch or clearcut), northwest Oregon and southwest Washington, USA, 2017–2019.</p
<p>Type III sums of squares. The dependent variable is attitude towards species management, with hig...
<p>The responses were square root transformed mean species counts per trap (Species Density, SD), an...
<p>Notes: F values of parameters included in best-fit models for each response variable are given. E...
Coefficient estimates and 95% confidence intervals from linear mixed-effects models (Gaussian respon...
(a) Species richness estimates at the stand-scale (black circles), within retention (white triangles...
<p>Results of linear mixed effects models testing precipitation change (PC) and functional group (FG...
Standardized coefficients with 95% confidence intervals from the averaged mixed effects model (ΔAICc...
Effect size (dots) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) for random intercepts estimated f...
Coefficient estimates (points) and 95% Bayesian credible intervals (horizontal lines) for effects of...
<p>((a) result of linear regression analysis between vegetation coverage which is estimated with LSM...
<p>Values indicate the change in occurrence predicted as a function of the change in one standard de...
Estimates of fixed-effect coefficients, with 95% confidence intervals, in the mixed-effects models.<...
<p>Abbreviations: LD, late dry season; EW, early wet season; W, wet season; LW, late wet season; ED,...
<p>The models assumed a normally distributed response with grass height log-transformed. Transect wa...
<p>OSR, % oilseed rape cover; SNA, % semi-natural cover; TE, total length of field edges; URB, % urb...
<p>Type III sums of squares. The dependent variable is attitude towards species management, with hig...
<p>The responses were square root transformed mean species counts per trap (Species Density, SD), an...
<p>Notes: F values of parameters included in best-fit models for each response variable are given. E...
Coefficient estimates and 95% confidence intervals from linear mixed-effects models (Gaussian respon...
(a) Species richness estimates at the stand-scale (black circles), within retention (white triangles...
<p>Results of linear mixed effects models testing precipitation change (PC) and functional group (FG...
Standardized coefficients with 95% confidence intervals from the averaged mixed effects model (ΔAICc...
Effect size (dots) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) for random intercepts estimated f...
Coefficient estimates (points) and 95% Bayesian credible intervals (horizontal lines) for effects of...
<p>((a) result of linear regression analysis between vegetation coverage which is estimated with LSM...
<p>Values indicate the change in occurrence predicted as a function of the change in one standard de...
Estimates of fixed-effect coefficients, with 95% confidence intervals, in the mixed-effects models.<...
<p>Abbreviations: LD, late dry season; EW, early wet season; W, wet season; LW, late wet season; ED,...
<p>The models assumed a normally distributed response with grass height log-transformed. Transect wa...
<p>OSR, % oilseed rape cover; SNA, % semi-natural cover; TE, total length of field edges; URB, % urb...
<p>Type III sums of squares. The dependent variable is attitude towards species management, with hig...
<p>The responses were square root transformed mean species counts per trap (Species Density, SD), an...
<p>Notes: F values of parameters included in best-fit models for each response variable are given. E...