The present paper deals with the objection that Paul Humphreys raised against the propensity interpretation of probability – “Humphreys’ paradox”. An update on existing solutions is offered, and it is concluded that none of them is completely satisfactory in view of Humphreys’ 2004 rejoinder. Positively, an original solution is formulated and discussed
This article argues that if propensities are displayed in objective physical chances, then the appro...
I defend a threefold form of pluralism about chance, involving a tripartite distinction between prop...
A pragmatic account of scientific understanding is used both to examine and to unify fundamental que...
The present paper deals with the objection that Paul Humphreys raised against the propensity interpr...
AbstractThe present paper deals with the objection that Paul Humphreys raised against the propensity...
Humphreys� Paradox (Humphreys 1985) can be solved if propensity theorists (i) adopt R�nyi�s 1955 pro...
Abstract (for The Review of Metaphysics): This paper outlines a genuinely pragmatist conception of p...
I analyse critically what I regard as the most accomplished empiricist account of propensities, name...
I analyse critically what I regard as the most accomplished empiricist account of propensities, name...
Abstract (for The Review of Metaphysics): This paper outlines a genuinely pragmatist conception of p...
Using “brute reason” I will show why there can be only one valid interpretation of probability. The ...
It was John Maynard Keynes [13] who first forcibly argued that probabilities cannot be simply ordere...
I analyse critically what I regard as the most accomplished empiricist account of propensities, name...
In this paper I present both a critical appraisal of Humphreys\u27 probabilistic theory of causality...
In this dissertation I aim to clarify the concept of probability. There are three kinds of interpret...
This article argues that if propensities are displayed in objective physical chances, then the appro...
I defend a threefold form of pluralism about chance, involving a tripartite distinction between prop...
A pragmatic account of scientific understanding is used both to examine and to unify fundamental que...
The present paper deals with the objection that Paul Humphreys raised against the propensity interpr...
AbstractThe present paper deals with the objection that Paul Humphreys raised against the propensity...
Humphreys� Paradox (Humphreys 1985) can be solved if propensity theorists (i) adopt R�nyi�s 1955 pro...
Abstract (for The Review of Metaphysics): This paper outlines a genuinely pragmatist conception of p...
I analyse critically what I regard as the most accomplished empiricist account of propensities, name...
I analyse critically what I regard as the most accomplished empiricist account of propensities, name...
Abstract (for The Review of Metaphysics): This paper outlines a genuinely pragmatist conception of p...
Using “brute reason” I will show why there can be only one valid interpretation of probability. The ...
It was John Maynard Keynes [13] who first forcibly argued that probabilities cannot be simply ordere...
I analyse critically what I regard as the most accomplished empiricist account of propensities, name...
In this paper I present both a critical appraisal of Humphreys\u27 probabilistic theory of causality...
In this dissertation I aim to clarify the concept of probability. There are three kinds of interpret...
This article argues that if propensities are displayed in objective physical chances, then the appro...
I defend a threefold form of pluralism about chance, involving a tripartite distinction between prop...
A pragmatic account of scientific understanding is used both to examine and to unify fundamental que...
DOI
Add to ORKG