Evaluation of virtual grid processed clinical chest radiographs

Objectives We evaluated the different Virtual Grid software ratios (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) on gridless clinical chest radiographs with visual grading analysis (VGA). In addition, we investigated the 2 image quality assessment algorithms (IQAAs). Materials and Methods Gridless chest radiographs of 50 different intensive care unit patients were collected and afterward processed with Virtual Grid software. Different software (SW) grid ratios-6:1, 10:1, 13:1, 17:1, and 20:1-were applied to investigate the image quality (IQ) improvement. Image quality improvement was assessed by 4 radiologists in a relative VGA study where the reference image was processed with SW grid ratio of 10:1. One of the IQAAs used to analyze the radiographs was implemented in our department but was originally developed by the research group of the Duke University Medical Center. A general IQ score (IQS) was calculated based on contrast, detail, and noise. Another IQAA-NIQE (naturalness image quality evaluator)-available in Matlab (MATLAB Research R2019b; the MathWorks, Inc) was evaluated. Both methods were compared with VGA. Results Visual grading analysis scores of gridless radiographs are significantly lower (P < 0.001). Image quality increases with increasing SW grid ratios, up to grid ratio of 17:1. However, some anatomical structures-spine and ribs-are negatively affected by the higher grid ratios. A correlation coefficient of 0.99 between the VGA and the IQS was observed. The correlation coefficient between VGA and NIQE was 1.00. Conclusions Virtual Grid with SW grid ratio of 6:1 improves the IQ of gridless chest bedside radiographs. The grid ratios 17:1 and 20:1 should be considered carefully as the SW negatively affects parts of the ribs and spine. Therefore, grid ratios up to 13:1 can be advised. The IQAAs are promising and could be used to detect differences in IQ when different scatter correction SW settings are used