Different Criteria of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Their Prognostic Value for Worsening Heart Failure or Major Arrhythmic Events in Patients With Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

International audienceThere are still controversies about pertinent criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and prophylactic indications for biventricular cardioverter-defibrillators, particularly in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC). This study compared several criteria for resynchronization therapy in IDC among those of several completed trials. In 201 patients with IDC, the relative risk for (1) death from heart failure (HF) or heart transplantation and (2) sudden death or sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia were calculated separately according to the inclusion criteria of the Multisite Stimulation in Cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC), InSync, Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation (MIRACLE), Pacing Therapies for Congestive Heart Failure (PATH-CHF), Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION), and CONTAK studies. The percentage of patients meeting the criteria ranged from 6% for those of MUSTIC to 23% for those of CONTAK. In a follow-up of 51 +/- 42 months, 28 patients died (15 from progressive HF, 13 from sudden death), 20 underwent heart transplantation, and 12 had sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Relative risks of worsening HF ranged from 3.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41 to 6.99, p = 0.005) for the MIRACLE criteria to 4.63 (95% CI 1.76 to 12.2, p = 0.0019) for the MUSTIC criteria. Only the CONTAK criteria were significantly associated with a risk for major arrhythmic events (2.65, 95% CI 1.19 to 5.95, p = 0.018). Arrhythmic events constituted 16% of all cardiac events for the MUSTIC patients, 11% for InSync patients, 31% for PATH-CHF patients, 36% for MIRACLE patients, 38% for COMPANION patients, and 42% for CONTAK patients. In conclusion, in IDC, the less restrictive criteria for CRT were associated with the greatest risk for arrhythmic events. In contrast, patients with the MUSTIC criteria for CRT mainly had a risk for worsening HF and may not benefit from biventricular cardioverter-defibrillators