Add to ORKGThe Supreme Court of Nevada addressed the standard for substituting an expert witness after the close of discovery and considered whether the district court abused its discretion in modifying the scheduling order, reopening discovery, and granting the motion to substitute. Torremoro requested a writ of mandamus requesting this Court to instruct the district court to reverse its order allowing substitution of an expert witness. The Court found that NRCP 16(b)(4)’s “good cause” test, in combination with any relevant local rules, provides the standard governing when a district court may modify a scheduling order. 2 The Court also concluded that the district court properly granted the motion to substitute the expert witness. The Court denied th...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether a district court’s denial of a defendant’s motion to sub...
Martinez Guzman was indicted by a grand jury for five burglaries and four murders occurring in two c...
The Court clarified the requirements for the introduction of an expert witness under NRS 50.275. Mor...
The Supreme Court of Nevada addressed the standard for substituting an expert witness after the clos...
The Court overruled Barto v. Weishaar, partly granted the petitioner’s writ of mandamus, and held th...
The Court considered a writ of mandamus challenging district court orders denying summary judgment o...
(1) The Court held the district court’s order was “contrary to the evidence” because the record was ...
Real parties in interest, Hurst and Abbington sought and obtained a pretrial order from the district...
Under NRS 22.030, for a district court to have jurisdiction to hold a party in indirect contempt, th...
Lyft challenged the district court’s decision overruling their objection to the discovery commission...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether a district court’s denial of a defendant’s motion to sub...
The Supreme Court denied petitioners’ application for a writ of mandamus for abuse of the district c...
(1) The Court held the district court’s order was “contrary to the evidence” because the record was ...
Lyft challenged the district court’s decision overruling their objection to the discovery commission...
Petitioners instituted a suit in the District Court for the Southern District of California seeking ...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether a district court’s denial of a defendant’s motion to sub...
Martinez Guzman was indicted by a grand jury for five burglaries and four murders occurring in two c...
The Court clarified the requirements for the introduction of an expert witness under NRS 50.275. Mor...
The Supreme Court of Nevada addressed the standard for substituting an expert witness after the clos...
The Court overruled Barto v. Weishaar, partly granted the petitioner’s writ of mandamus, and held th...
The Court considered a writ of mandamus challenging district court orders denying summary judgment o...
(1) The Court held the district court’s order was “contrary to the evidence” because the record was ...
Real parties in interest, Hurst and Abbington sought and obtained a pretrial order from the district...
Under NRS 22.030, for a district court to have jurisdiction to hold a party in indirect contempt, th...
Lyft challenged the district court’s decision overruling their objection to the discovery commission...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether a district court’s denial of a defendant’s motion to sub...
The Supreme Court denied petitioners’ application for a writ of mandamus for abuse of the district c...
(1) The Court held the district court’s order was “contrary to the evidence” because the record was ...
Lyft challenged the district court’s decision overruling their objection to the discovery commission...
Petitioners instituted a suit in the District Court for the Southern District of California seeking ...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether a district court’s denial of a defendant’s motion to sub...
Martinez Guzman was indicted by a grand jury for five burglaries and four murders occurring in two c...
The Court clarified the requirements for the introduction of an expert witness under NRS 50.275. Mor...