The federal government brought an action to restrain the United States Gypsum Company and thirteen other corporate and individual defendants from alleged violations of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. Most of the government\u27s evidence came from defendant\u27s officers, employees, and documents with the result that evidence favorable to both the plaintiff and defendants was presented. The government\u27s case required over five months to present and 10,000 pages to record. The defendants then moved to dismiss the complaint with prejudice under Rule 41 (b). In the hearing on this motion, the government contended that the sole question presented was one of law, namely, whether the evidence made out a prima facie case. The defendants asserted tha...
Two suits based on the Federal Employers\u27 Liability Act were brought in the Circuit Court of the ...
Petitioner was served with a subpoena ordering him to appear before the House Committee on Un-Americ...
In 1956 plaintiff corporation brought a private antitrust action against various persons and corpora...
The federal government brought an action to restrain the United States Gypsum Company and thirteen o...
This action was brought in a South Carolina state court and removed to the federal district court on...
The United States brought an action against defendants, movie distributors and producers, for allege...
Petitioner brought suit against respondent railroad under the Jones Act for the wrongful death of he...
SINCE 1938, Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Federal Rules or Rules) has set the s...
Appellee, the United States government, by a proceeding in rem, sought to condemn two shipments of c...
Plaintiff sued for damages and loss of profits caused by the unlawful acts of the defendant beginnin...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) and its state law counterparts permit, under certain circumsta...
The administrator of the Office of Price Administration began an action on behalf of the United Stat...
In two related antitrust actions instituted in the District Court for the Northern District of Illin...
Defendant, a Delaware corporation, was indicted in the Eastern District of Illinois for violations o...
ln a Federal District Court in New York, plaintiff, a resident of Virginia, sued defendant, a Pennsy...
Two suits based on the Federal Employers\u27 Liability Act were brought in the Circuit Court of the ...
Petitioner was served with a subpoena ordering him to appear before the House Committee on Un-Americ...
In 1956 plaintiff corporation brought a private antitrust action against various persons and corpora...
The federal government brought an action to restrain the United States Gypsum Company and thirteen o...
This action was brought in a South Carolina state court and removed to the federal district court on...
The United States brought an action against defendants, movie distributors and producers, for allege...
Petitioner brought suit against respondent railroad under the Jones Act for the wrongful death of he...
SINCE 1938, Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Federal Rules or Rules) has set the s...
Appellee, the United States government, by a proceeding in rem, sought to condemn two shipments of c...
Plaintiff sued for damages and loss of profits caused by the unlawful acts of the defendant beginnin...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) and its state law counterparts permit, under certain circumsta...
The administrator of the Office of Price Administration began an action on behalf of the United Stat...
In two related antitrust actions instituted in the District Court for the Northern District of Illin...
Defendant, a Delaware corporation, was indicted in the Eastern District of Illinois for violations o...
ln a Federal District Court in New York, plaintiff, a resident of Virginia, sued defendant, a Pennsy...
Two suits based on the Federal Employers\u27 Liability Act were brought in the Circuit Court of the ...
Petitioner was served with a subpoena ordering him to appear before the House Committee on Un-Americ...
In 1956 plaintiff corporation brought a private antitrust action against various persons and corpora...