This Article explores the role of the common law in Supreme Court interpretation and application of § 1983, which grants a cause of action for violations of constitutional rights committed under color of any [state] statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage. \u27 I argue that the common law has served primarily to narrow the reach of § 1983, and that this is inappropriate in light of the broad statutory language and the absence of good evidence that the enacting Congress intended a narrower application than the statutory language indicates
We have long recognized that the resurrection of section 1983 converted the fourteenth amendment fro...
Today it is not unusual for a § 1983 plaintiff to establish a violation of the U.S. Constitution and...
Government officers may harm persons in many ways. When an official inflicts a physical injury, caus...
This Article explores the role of the common law in Supreme Court interpretation and application of ...
Amidst the whirl of commentary about how the U.S. Supreme Court has become increasingly textualist a...
Constitutional tort law marries the substantive rights granted by the Constitution to the remedial m...
This article uses the theories of H.L.A. Hart to provide an interpretive framework for a vital civil...
Motivated by civil unrest and the police conduct that prompted it, Americans have embarked on a majo...
The subject of this article is why people make federal cases, under section 1983,\u27 out of claims ...
The point of departure in the Constitution is that the existing legal ordershould largely be kept in...
The cause of action for damages to redress violations of constitutional rights is now firmly establi...
The Civil Rights Act of 18711 ( § 1983 ) establishes a tort-like remedy for persons deprived of fede...
This article examines the common law backgrounds of late nineteenth and early twentieth century Amer...
In the current post-Erie age of statutes the Supreme Court continues to have potential influence ove...
Section 1983 is the major enforcer of individual federal constitutional rights. It authorizes indivi...
We have long recognized that the resurrection of section 1983 converted the fourteenth amendment fro...
Today it is not unusual for a § 1983 plaintiff to establish a violation of the U.S. Constitution and...
Government officers may harm persons in many ways. When an official inflicts a physical injury, caus...
This Article explores the role of the common law in Supreme Court interpretation and application of ...
Amidst the whirl of commentary about how the U.S. Supreme Court has become increasingly textualist a...
Constitutional tort law marries the substantive rights granted by the Constitution to the remedial m...
This article uses the theories of H.L.A. Hart to provide an interpretive framework for a vital civil...
Motivated by civil unrest and the police conduct that prompted it, Americans have embarked on a majo...
The subject of this article is why people make federal cases, under section 1983,\u27 out of claims ...
The point of departure in the Constitution is that the existing legal ordershould largely be kept in...
The cause of action for damages to redress violations of constitutional rights is now firmly establi...
The Civil Rights Act of 18711 ( § 1983 ) establishes a tort-like remedy for persons deprived of fede...
This article examines the common law backgrounds of late nineteenth and early twentieth century Amer...
In the current post-Erie age of statutes the Supreme Court continues to have potential influence ove...
Section 1983 is the major enforcer of individual federal constitutional rights. It authorizes indivi...
We have long recognized that the resurrection of section 1983 converted the fourteenth amendment fro...
Today it is not unusual for a § 1983 plaintiff to establish a violation of the U.S. Constitution and...
Government officers may harm persons in many ways. When an official inflicts a physical injury, caus...