BACKGROUND: This randomised phase III study investigated if in responsive and stable disease (SD) stage IV patients after two courses of cisplatin and gemcitabine, single-agent gemcitabine (experimental arm) was not inferior in terms of overall survival (OS) to cisplatin-gemcitabine (standard arm). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Noninferiority was defined as an increase in the hazard of death (HR) < or = 1.33 in the experimental arm. From January 2001 to February 2004, 340 patients were registered and 250 were randomised. Cisplatin was administered on day 1 at 75 mg/m2 and Gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 at 1250 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Response rate after two courses was 29%. The 1-year progression-free survival was 13% in both arms. One-year sur...
BACKGROUND Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is standard treatment for the majority of pati...
Abstract- Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung ca...
Abstract Background: The FAST is a 2 × 2 factorial trial addressing two questions: (1) the role of ...
BackgroundThere is no consensus on the optimal treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell l...
International audienceBACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal treatment for patients with a...
This randomized trial was designed to investigate the feasibility, toxicity, and activity of two dif...
Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung...
PURPOSE: To compare gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) with mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (MIC...
The role of new cytotoxic agents like gemcitabine has not yet been proven in the neoadjuvant setting...
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of domestic Gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with stage ...
Purpose: This phase III randomized trial compared two chemotherapy regimens, gemcitabine plus carbop...
Objective: Cisplatin is widely used for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. However, it can...
INTRODUCTION: We report the results of a phase II trial exploring the efficacy and the feasibili...
Objective: Cisplatin-gemcitabine (PG) and cisplatin-etoposide (PE) combinations are active regimens ...
BACKGROUND Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is standard treatment for the majority of pati...
Abstract- Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung ca...
Abstract Background: The FAST is a 2 × 2 factorial trial addressing two questions: (1) the role of ...
BackgroundThere is no consensus on the optimal treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell l...
International audienceBACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal treatment for patients with a...
This randomized trial was designed to investigate the feasibility, toxicity, and activity of two dif...
Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung...
PURPOSE: To compare gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) with mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (MIC...
The role of new cytotoxic agents like gemcitabine has not yet been proven in the neoadjuvant setting...
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of domestic Gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with stage ...
Purpose: This phase III randomized trial compared two chemotherapy regimens, gemcitabine plus carbop...
Objective: Cisplatin is widely used for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. However, it can...
INTRODUCTION: We report the results of a phase II trial exploring the efficacy and the feasibili...
Objective: Cisplatin-gemcitabine (PG) and cisplatin-etoposide (PE) combinations are active regimens ...
BACKGROUND Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is standard treatment for the majority of pati...
Abstract- Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung ca...
Abstract Background: The FAST is a 2 × 2 factorial trial addressing two questions: (1) the role of ...