The response to Markus Altena Davidsen’s article ‘Theo van Baaren’s Systematic Science of Religion Revisited: The Current Crisis in Dutch Study of Religion and a Way Out’ analyses the image of anthropology depicted in the article. It delineates the role anthropology plays in formulating Davidsen’s vision for a new disciplinary identity and research agenda of a ‘science of reli- gion’. The response further questions if reanimating a research program from the mid-20th century is indeed the way forward for the discipline. The last part will discuss different views of comparison and its role in research on religion at large
One of the most difficult aspects of trying to understand ‘phenomenology' in the study of reli...
In 1960, the Dutch journal of the Catholic Social-Ecclesial Institute (Kaski) Sociaal Kompas became ...
The religious history of the Netherlands during the last two centuries exhibits some of the same dyn...
In a response to Markus Davidsen’s article ‘Theo van Baaren’s Systematic Science of Religion Revisit...
In a response to Markus Davidsen’s article ‘Theo van Baaren’s Systematic Science of Religion Revisit...
In a secular society, as is the Netherlands, the position of religions and religious organisations i...
This article revisits Theo van Baaren’s (1912-1989) call for a ‘systematic science of religion’. Wit...
In this reply I engage with the response articles by Kocku von Stuckrad, Katja Rakow, Eric Venbrux, ...
The study of religion exceeds the boundaries of the comparative, or systematic, study of religion in...
An earlier version of this article was presented as keynote lecture at the annual conference of the ...
Theology, religious studies, the history of religion, and the anthropology of religion have differen...
The Dutch approach of religious matters is still characterized by an approach that fits in the 19th ...
What counts as sociology of religion? The burden of a rich past In 1960, the Dutch journal of the Ca...
The study of comparative religion in the Netherlands seemed to me to be in a state of stagnation whe...
Religion is one of the most challenging subjects of study. Long expected to vanish with modernizatio...
One of the most difficult aspects of trying to understand ‘phenomenology' in the study of reli...
In 1960, the Dutch journal of the Catholic Social-Ecclesial Institute (Kaski) Sociaal Kompas became ...
The religious history of the Netherlands during the last two centuries exhibits some of the same dyn...
In a response to Markus Davidsen’s article ‘Theo van Baaren’s Systematic Science of Religion Revisit...
In a response to Markus Davidsen’s article ‘Theo van Baaren’s Systematic Science of Religion Revisit...
In a secular society, as is the Netherlands, the position of religions and religious organisations i...
This article revisits Theo van Baaren’s (1912-1989) call for a ‘systematic science of religion’. Wit...
In this reply I engage with the response articles by Kocku von Stuckrad, Katja Rakow, Eric Venbrux, ...
The study of religion exceeds the boundaries of the comparative, or systematic, study of religion in...
An earlier version of this article was presented as keynote lecture at the annual conference of the ...
Theology, religious studies, the history of religion, and the anthropology of religion have differen...
The Dutch approach of religious matters is still characterized by an approach that fits in the 19th ...
What counts as sociology of religion? The burden of a rich past In 1960, the Dutch journal of the Ca...
The study of comparative religion in the Netherlands seemed to me to be in a state of stagnation whe...
Religion is one of the most challenging subjects of study. Long expected to vanish with modernizatio...
One of the most difficult aspects of trying to understand ‘phenomenology' in the study of reli...
In 1960, the Dutch journal of the Catholic Social-Ecclesial Institute (Kaski) Sociaal Kompas became ...
The religious history of the Netherlands during the last two centuries exhibits some of the same dyn...