This chapter illustrates the peculiar nature of the Boards of Appeal (BoA) of EU agencies, which has been affected by two fundamental changes in the general landscape of the EU system of judicial protection. The changes include the fall of the specialized tribunals, which resulted in greater room for the development of the BoAs and the introduction of the filter mechanism in Article 58a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). It evaluates how the changes have affected the institutional position of the BoAs of the EU agencies and elaborates how they might evolve over the next few years. The chapter discusses the traditional understanding of the BoAs, framing the misleading principle of functional conti...
This chapter provides the introduction to the edited volume by spotlighting the Boards of Appeal (Bo...
In Germany v ECHA and BASF v ECHA , the General Court was asked, for the very first time, to review ...
This paper offers some lessons drawn from the first years of experience of both the joint Board of A...
Article 58a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, introduced through Regulat...
While the EU agencies that have been granted the power to adopt binding decisions are a diverse grou...
This chapter examines Article 58a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU...
This chapter offers concluding observations on the essence and functioning of the Boards of Appeal (...
This chapter examines the nature of the Boards of Appeal (BoAs) of EU financial agencies and the typ...
The article examines the Boards od Appeal entrusted with the task of reviewing administrative decisi...
Agencification phenomenon in the EU has led to concerns about controls over EU agencies’ actions. As...
The article examines the Boards of Appeal entrusted with the task of reviewing administrative decisi...
The article examines the Boards of Appeal entrusted with the task of reviewing administrative decis...
In Germany v ECHA and BASF v ECHA , the General Court was asked, for the very first time, to review ...
This chapter provides the introduction to the edited volume by spotlighting the Boards of Appeal (Bo...
In Germany v ECHA and BASF v ECHA , the General Court was asked, for the very first time, to review ...
This paper offers some lessons drawn from the first years of experience of both the joint Board of A...
Article 58a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, introduced through Regulat...
While the EU agencies that have been granted the power to adopt binding decisions are a diverse grou...
This chapter examines Article 58a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU...
This chapter offers concluding observations on the essence and functioning of the Boards of Appeal (...
This chapter examines the nature of the Boards of Appeal (BoAs) of EU financial agencies and the typ...
The article examines the Boards od Appeal entrusted with the task of reviewing administrative decisi...
Agencification phenomenon in the EU has led to concerns about controls over EU agencies’ actions. As...
The article examines the Boards of Appeal entrusted with the task of reviewing administrative decisi...
The article examines the Boards of Appeal entrusted with the task of reviewing administrative decis...
In Germany v ECHA and BASF v ECHA , the General Court was asked, for the very first time, to review ...
This chapter provides the introduction to the edited volume by spotlighting the Boards of Appeal (Bo...
In Germany v ECHA and BASF v ECHA , the General Court was asked, for the very first time, to review ...
This paper offers some lessons drawn from the first years of experience of both the joint Board of A...