This is the final version. Available from Wiley via the DOI in this record. There is a sign error in equation (24), and subsequently in equations (27) and (28), in the paper by Kwasniok et al. (). These equations correctly read: (Formula presented.) (Formula presented.) (Formula presented.) Figure 8 is affected by this error. However, we remark that, as argued by Haynes and McIntyre (), the diabatic PV flux (Formula presented.) along isentropic surfaces is usually very small in comparison to the flux JF associated with typical gravity wave drag forces F. Hence the authors still believe that the two prominent events of removal of circulation from the vortex due to frictional processes visible in Figure 8 between mid-January and mid-February ...
[1] In the paper “Spatial and temporal dynamics in eddy covariance observations of methane fluxes at...
The authors would like to apologize for an error in terminology of the original paper ‘Crustal thick...
The publisher apologises that upon publication of this article a typographical error was introduced ...
In Table 2 of Elsbury et al. (2019), titled "The atmospheric response to positive IPV, positive AMV,...
This is a corrigendum to Fernández-Castro et al. (2020), in which a number of editing errors were fo...
A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this...
The above article was originally published online in Early View on 20 November 2009, and subsequentl...
AbstractThis is the erratum to the Letter [R.A. Konoplya, Phys. Lett. B 666 (2008) 283]. The formula...
International audienceCorrection to: Solar Phys (2018) 293:75 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-127...
Erratum in: Annales Geophysicae, vol. 35, iss. 3, p. 721–731, DOI: 10.5194/angeo-35-721-2017</p
The authors regret that Figure 4 of McAndrews et al. (2009) has been found to contain three errors: ...
Due to an oversight of ours in proofreading and a communication problem with the publisher, the figu...
International audienceThe above article was originally published online in Early View on 20 November...
After publication of the paper, an error in computing the ratio $\gamma$ of kinetic to potential ene...
The authors regret that Figure 4 of McAndrews et al. (2009) has been found to contain three errors: ...
[1] In the paper “Spatial and temporal dynamics in eddy covariance observations of methane fluxes at...
The authors would like to apologize for an error in terminology of the original paper ‘Crustal thick...
The publisher apologises that upon publication of this article a typographical error was introduced ...
In Table 2 of Elsbury et al. (2019), titled "The atmospheric response to positive IPV, positive AMV,...
This is a corrigendum to Fernández-Castro et al. (2020), in which a number of editing errors were fo...
A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this...
The above article was originally published online in Early View on 20 November 2009, and subsequentl...
AbstractThis is the erratum to the Letter [R.A. Konoplya, Phys. Lett. B 666 (2008) 283]. The formula...
International audienceCorrection to: Solar Phys (2018) 293:75 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-127...
Erratum in: Annales Geophysicae, vol. 35, iss. 3, p. 721–731, DOI: 10.5194/angeo-35-721-2017</p
The authors regret that Figure 4 of McAndrews et al. (2009) has been found to contain three errors: ...
Due to an oversight of ours in proofreading and a communication problem with the publisher, the figu...
International audienceThe above article was originally published online in Early View on 20 November...
After publication of the paper, an error in computing the ratio $\gamma$ of kinetic to potential ene...
The authors regret that Figure 4 of McAndrews et al. (2009) has been found to contain three errors: ...
[1] In the paper “Spatial and temporal dynamics in eddy covariance observations of methane fluxes at...
The authors would like to apologize for an error in terminology of the original paper ‘Crustal thick...
The publisher apologises that upon publication of this article a typographical error was introduced ...