Is Altitude Training Bad for the Running Mechanics of Middle-Distance Runners?

AIMS: It has been hypothesized that altitude training may alter running mechanics due to several factors such as the slower training velocity with associated alteration in muscle activation and coordination. This would lead to an altered running mechanics attested by an increase in mechanical work for a given intensity and to the need to "re-establish" the neuromuscular coordination and running biomechanics postaltitude. Therefore, the present study aimed to test the hypothesis that "live high-train high" would induce alteration in the running biomechanics (ie, longer contact time, higher vertical oscillations, decreased stiffness, higher external work). METHODS: Before and 2 to 3 days after 3 weeks of altitude training (1850-2200 m), 9 national-level middle-distance (800-5000 m) male runners performed 2 successive 5-minute bouts of running at moderate intensity on an instrumented treadmill with measured ground reaction forces and gas exchanges. Immediately after the running trials, peak knee extensor torque was assessed during isometric maximal voluntary contraction. RESULTS: Except for a slight (-3.0%; P = .04) decrease in vertical stiffness, no mechanical parameters (stride frequency and length, contact and flight times, ground reaction forces, and kinetic and potential work) were modified from prealtitude to postaltitude camp. Running oxygen cost was also unchanged. DISCUSSION: The present study is the first one to report that "live high-train high" did not change the main running mechanical parameters, even when measured immediately after the altitude camp. This result has an important practical implication: there is no need for a corrective period at sea level for "normalizing" the running mechanics after an altitude camp