Cataloged from PDF version of article.We consider a dynamic trade relationship where quality is not contractible and potential sellers retain quality-relevant private information. We show that the presence of an investment technology to improve the incumbent seller's innate quality may impair the efficiency of the screening process. If the conflict is effective, the buyer has to induce an inefficient screening process or reduce the productivity of the investment technology. This conflict suggests that the hold-up problem may be more severe than predicted by models of incomplete contracts that assume complete information. © Elsevier Science B.V
Under conventional contract theory, contracts may be efficient by protecting relationship-specific i...
Under conventional contract theory, contracts may be efficient by protecting relationship specific i...
This paper endogenizes a monopolist's choice between selling and renting in a non-anonymous durable ...
We consider a dynamic trade relationship where quality is not contractible and potential sellers ret...
This paper explores implications of interactions between noncontractibility of quality, multidimensi...
Under conventional contract theory, contracts may be efficient by protecting relationship specific i...
Under conventional contract theory, contracts may be efficient by protecting relationship specific i...
I analyze a model of hold-up with asymmetric information at the contracting stage. The asymmetry of ...
This work studies how the introduction of competition to the side of the market offering trading con...
Under conventional contract theory, contracts may be efficient by protecting relationship-specific i...
In the hold-up problem incomplete contracts cause the proceeds of relation specific investments to b...
In the hold-up problem incomplete contracts cause the proceeds of relation specific investments to b...
I analyze a simple model of hold-up with asymmetric information at the contracting stage. I show tha...
Under conventional contract theory, contracts may be efficient by protecting relationship-specific i...
Under conventional contract theory, contracts may be efficient by protecting relationship-specific i...
Under conventional contract theory, contracts may be efficient by protecting relationship-specific i...
Under conventional contract theory, contracts may be efficient by protecting relationship specific i...
This paper endogenizes a monopolist's choice between selling and renting in a non-anonymous durable ...
We consider a dynamic trade relationship where quality is not contractible and potential sellers ret...
This paper explores implications of interactions between noncontractibility of quality, multidimensi...
Under conventional contract theory, contracts may be efficient by protecting relationship specific i...
Under conventional contract theory, contracts may be efficient by protecting relationship specific i...
I analyze a model of hold-up with asymmetric information at the contracting stage. The asymmetry of ...
This work studies how the introduction of competition to the side of the market offering trading con...
Under conventional contract theory, contracts may be efficient by protecting relationship-specific i...
In the hold-up problem incomplete contracts cause the proceeds of relation specific investments to b...
In the hold-up problem incomplete contracts cause the proceeds of relation specific investments to b...
I analyze a simple model of hold-up with asymmetric information at the contracting stage. I show tha...
Under conventional contract theory, contracts may be efficient by protecting relationship-specific i...
Under conventional contract theory, contracts may be efficient by protecting relationship-specific i...
Under conventional contract theory, contracts may be efficient by protecting relationship-specific i...
Under conventional contract theory, contracts may be efficient by protecting relationship specific i...
This paper endogenizes a monopolist's choice between selling and renting in a non-anonymous durable ...