The problem of defining a hermitian quantum phase operator is nearly as old as quantum mechanics itself. Throughout the years, a number of solutions was proposed, ranging from abstract operator formalisms to phase-space methods. In this work, we make an explicit connection between two of the most prominent approaches, by proving that the probability distribution of phase in the Paul formalism follows exactly from the Pegg-Barnett formalism by combining the latter with the quantum limited amplifier channel. Our findings suggest that the Paul framework may be viewed as a semi-classical limit of the Pegg-Barnett approach.Comment: 8 pages + 2-page Appendi
Robertson's formalized version of the Heisenberg uncertainty relation contains a state of interest a...
We provide a modification to the quantum phase estimation algorithm (QPEA) inspired on classical win...
The exact solution of the Lindblad equation with a quadratic Hamiltonian and linear coupling operato...
An alternative derivation of the Pegg-Barnett phase operator is presented. This approach is based on...
Describing the phase of an electromagnetic field mode or harmonic oscillator has been an obstacle si...
We establish a general condition which must be obeyed by every operator referred to the quantum phas...
Using the Glauber model of linear phase insensitive amplifier as the basis, we establish a general c...
In papers by Lynch [Phys. Rev. A41, 2841 (1990)] and Gerry and Urbanski [Phys. Rev. A42, 662 (1990)]...
In response to the objection raised by Pegg and Vaccaro [the preceding Comment] we point out that th...
We find the states of light which have minimum phase variance both for a given maximum energy state ...
Following the discussion-in state-space language-presented in a preceding paper, we work on the pass...
We formulate the notion of quantum group symmetry of the Hamiltonian corresponding to Potts model an...
A comprehensive theory of phase for finite-dimensional quantum systems is developed. The only physic...
Wigner’s 1932 quasi-probability Distribution Function in phase-space, his first paper in English, is...
To find an operator representation of the phase variable of a single-mode electromagnetic field, the...
Robertson's formalized version of the Heisenberg uncertainty relation contains a state of interest a...
We provide a modification to the quantum phase estimation algorithm (QPEA) inspired on classical win...
The exact solution of the Lindblad equation with a quadratic Hamiltonian and linear coupling operato...
An alternative derivation of the Pegg-Barnett phase operator is presented. This approach is based on...
Describing the phase of an electromagnetic field mode or harmonic oscillator has been an obstacle si...
We establish a general condition which must be obeyed by every operator referred to the quantum phas...
Using the Glauber model of linear phase insensitive amplifier as the basis, we establish a general c...
In papers by Lynch [Phys. Rev. A41, 2841 (1990)] and Gerry and Urbanski [Phys. Rev. A42, 662 (1990)]...
In response to the objection raised by Pegg and Vaccaro [the preceding Comment] we point out that th...
We find the states of light which have minimum phase variance both for a given maximum energy state ...
Following the discussion-in state-space language-presented in a preceding paper, we work on the pass...
We formulate the notion of quantum group symmetry of the Hamiltonian corresponding to Potts model an...
A comprehensive theory of phase for finite-dimensional quantum systems is developed. The only physic...
Wigner’s 1932 quasi-probability Distribution Function in phase-space, his first paper in English, is...
To find an operator representation of the phase variable of a single-mode electromagnetic field, the...
Robertson's formalized version of the Heisenberg uncertainty relation contains a state of interest a...
We provide a modification to the quantum phase estimation algorithm (QPEA) inspired on classical win...
The exact solution of the Lindblad equation with a quadratic Hamiltonian and linear coupling operato...