INTRODUCTION : The paper reports on the subject domain expertise of the ISIC2018 international programme committee (i.e., reviewers) to assess how the reviewer expertise reflects information behaviour research, related fields, trends in the information behaviour research landscape, and opportunities for collaboration. METHOD :The paper is based on a scoping review of selected key publications of reviewers indexed in three proprietary databases covering library and information science and interdisciplinary research. References were exported to EndNote databases; one per reviewer. ANALYSIS : A thematic analysis of more than four thousand references (duplicates removed) identified the key focus areas of information behaviour. T...
This paper profiles the types of research activity that have been published in EJIS from 1997 to 200...
Research publication in peer-reviewed journals is an important avenue for knowledge dissemination. H...
Journal editors have observed a greater occurrence of reviewers agreeing to peer review but never co...
INTRODUCTION : The paper reports on the subject domain expertise of the ISIC2018 international pro...
A fair review process is essential to the success of any scientific conference. In this paper we pre...
Proceedings of ISIC: the information behaviour conference, Pretoria, South Africa, 28th September to...
This paper reports on a scoping review of the literature on the information behaviour and informatio...
The IS field needs more great reviewers. What is a great reviewer? In her June 2005 editorial for MI...
The quality of research published in journals is not only dependent on the work performed by authors...
International audienceLiterature reviews (LRs) are recognized for their increasing impact in the inf...
© the authors, 2008. Results. People attend ISIC conferences because of a desire to connect with res...
The paper presents the report of a panel that debated the review process in the information systems ...
Serbian Citation Index – SCIndeks is a hybrid Open Access platform based on a business model of part...
Panel, Information Seeking in Context (ISIC), Berlin, September 26 - 29, 2022Information behaviour r...
Peer review is a mainstay of academic publication – indeed, it is the peer-review process that provi...
This paper profiles the types of research activity that have been published in EJIS from 1997 to 200...
Research publication in peer-reviewed journals is an important avenue for knowledge dissemination. H...
Journal editors have observed a greater occurrence of reviewers agreeing to peer review but never co...
INTRODUCTION : The paper reports on the subject domain expertise of the ISIC2018 international pro...
A fair review process is essential to the success of any scientific conference. In this paper we pre...
Proceedings of ISIC: the information behaviour conference, Pretoria, South Africa, 28th September to...
This paper reports on a scoping review of the literature on the information behaviour and informatio...
The IS field needs more great reviewers. What is a great reviewer? In her June 2005 editorial for MI...
The quality of research published in journals is not only dependent on the work performed by authors...
International audienceLiterature reviews (LRs) are recognized for their increasing impact in the inf...
© the authors, 2008. Results. People attend ISIC conferences because of a desire to connect with res...
The paper presents the report of a panel that debated the review process in the information systems ...
Serbian Citation Index – SCIndeks is a hybrid Open Access platform based on a business model of part...
Panel, Information Seeking in Context (ISIC), Berlin, September 26 - 29, 2022Information behaviour r...
Peer review is a mainstay of academic publication – indeed, it is the peer-review process that provi...
This paper profiles the types of research activity that have been published in EJIS from 1997 to 200...
Research publication in peer-reviewed journals is an important avenue for knowledge dissemination. H...
Journal editors have observed a greater occurrence of reviewers agreeing to peer review but never co...