Standardization and quality assurance in skeletal landmark placement and osteometry

Studies revising methodology are essential to the development and standardization of the field of anthropology, especially as the ultimate goal is improved forensic analyses. A series of revisions were made to the Standards for Data Collection Procedures reference manual. This includes changes made to the definitions of several standard measurements ranging from modified landmark placement to variation in the proper orientation of the caliper. The aim of this paper was to compare measurements collected using the different sets of definitions to determine if the measurements would differ significantly. Fifteen measurements were collected from 30 crania and postcrania, first using the original definitions, and then using the modified definitions and/or landmarks. The measurement differences for the 2 sets of definitions were assessed using technical error of measurement and a Kruskal-Wallis test. Results indicate that 8 of the 15 measurements differed significantly when the modified definitions were employed. Therefore, data collected using the different sets of definitions should not be used interchangeably. Forensic practitioners and laboratories making use of the updated reference manual must take into consideration how the current results might influence their standard operating procedures. Furthermore, all databases that currently make use of the original measurements, such as the South African-specific databases used in Fordisc, must be updated to include the modified measurements to stay on par with international data collection standards.http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forsciint2021-03-01hj2020Anatom