This paper reports results from a classroom dictator game comparing the effects of three different sets of standard instructions. The results show that seemingly small and typically unreported differences in standard instructions induce different perceptions regarding entitlement and ownership of the money to be distributed, and that these perceptions influence behaviour. Less is given when the task is described as a task of generosity and more when the task is a task of distribution (average 35% vs. 52%). The results can contribute to explaining the large variation in dictator game giving reported in the literature and show that even small and unreported differences in instructions change how the game is perceived. JEL codes: C70; C91; D6
There is some evidence from field studies and natural experiments that levels of charitable donation...
There is some evidence from field studies and natural experiments that levels of charitable donation...
We examine a dictator game with a "voice" option in the laboratory. In our experiment, the recipient...
In both dictator and impunity games, one player, the dictator, divides a fixed amount of money betwe...
We use modified dictator games in which the productivity of taking or giving is varied. Subjects hav...
The dictator game represents a workhorse within experimental economics, frequently used to test theo...
Recent papers on double-blind dictator games have obtained significant generous behavior when inform...
A number of recent papers on double-blind dictator games have obtained significant generous behavior...
Theoretical thesis.Bibliography: pages 99-104.1. Introduction and motivation -- 2. Literature review...
Previous experimental literature on reputation studies its effects in environments where they are of...
We use modified dictator games in which the productivity of taking or giving is varied. Subjects hav...
Despite the size and impact of the US charitable giving sector, the mechanisms and effects of social...
To investigate the external validity of Ultimatum and Dictator game behavior we conduct experiments ...
In this experiment, we test whether subjects’ responses to variations in the action set in a d...
This paper investigates the effect of poverty and good intentions on dictator game giving. Previous ...
There is some evidence from field studies and natural experiments that levels of charitable donation...
There is some evidence from field studies and natural experiments that levels of charitable donation...
We examine a dictator game with a "voice" option in the laboratory. In our experiment, the recipient...
In both dictator and impunity games, one player, the dictator, divides a fixed amount of money betwe...
We use modified dictator games in which the productivity of taking or giving is varied. Subjects hav...
The dictator game represents a workhorse within experimental economics, frequently used to test theo...
Recent papers on double-blind dictator games have obtained significant generous behavior when inform...
A number of recent papers on double-blind dictator games have obtained significant generous behavior...
Theoretical thesis.Bibliography: pages 99-104.1. Introduction and motivation -- 2. Literature review...
Previous experimental literature on reputation studies its effects in environments where they are of...
We use modified dictator games in which the productivity of taking or giving is varied. Subjects hav...
Despite the size and impact of the US charitable giving sector, the mechanisms and effects of social...
To investigate the external validity of Ultimatum and Dictator game behavior we conduct experiments ...
In this experiment, we test whether subjects’ responses to variations in the action set in a d...
This paper investigates the effect of poverty and good intentions on dictator game giving. Previous ...
There is some evidence from field studies and natural experiments that levels of charitable donation...
There is some evidence from field studies and natural experiments that levels of charitable donation...
We examine a dictator game with a "voice" option in the laboratory. In our experiment, the recipient...