Linguistics, and typology in particular, can have a bright future. We justify this optimism by discussing comparability from two angles. First, we take the opportunity presented by this special issue ofto pause for a moment and make explicit some of the logical underpinnings of typological sciences, linguistics included, which we believe are worth reminding ourselves of. Second, we give a brief illustration of comparison, and particularly measurement, within modern typology
pursuing one of the same goals as generative grammar: to determine the limits of pos-sible human lan...
In this online talk, I report on some of the conceptual challenges that arise in creating typologica...
In this article, one of the important branches of linguistics, typology, or rather, comparative typo...
Linguistics, and typology in particular, can have a bright future. We justify this optimism by discu...
Linguistics, and typology in particular, can have a bright future. We justify this optimism by discu...
Round & Corbett’s (2020) paper on “comparability and measurement in typological science” is an inter...
Language comparison was long restricted to the question of phylogenetic inheritance (e.g. Bopp 1816;...
In this note we want to propose that, at the present stage of its development, the study of formal g...
The goal of this article is twofold: to present a brief overview of differences and similarities bet...
Michael Daniel, in his chapter 'Linguistic typology and the study of language' in The Oxford Handboo...
For some time in the field of typology there has been debate about the nature of the categories or c...
Here I argue that the distinction between comparative concepts and descriptive categories helps lang...
This paper reasserts the fundamental conceptual distinction between language- particular categories ...
This paper reasserts the fundamental conceptual distinction between language- particular categories ...
This paper reasserts the fundamental conceptual distinction between language- particular categories ...
pursuing one of the same goals as generative grammar: to determine the limits of pos-sible human lan...
In this online talk, I report on some of the conceptual challenges that arise in creating typologica...
In this article, one of the important branches of linguistics, typology, or rather, comparative typo...
Linguistics, and typology in particular, can have a bright future. We justify this optimism by discu...
Linguistics, and typology in particular, can have a bright future. We justify this optimism by discu...
Round & Corbett’s (2020) paper on “comparability and measurement in typological science” is an inter...
Language comparison was long restricted to the question of phylogenetic inheritance (e.g. Bopp 1816;...
In this note we want to propose that, at the present stage of its development, the study of formal g...
The goal of this article is twofold: to present a brief overview of differences and similarities bet...
Michael Daniel, in his chapter 'Linguistic typology and the study of language' in The Oxford Handboo...
For some time in the field of typology there has been debate about the nature of the categories or c...
Here I argue that the distinction between comparative concepts and descriptive categories helps lang...
This paper reasserts the fundamental conceptual distinction between language- particular categories ...
This paper reasserts the fundamental conceptual distinction between language- particular categories ...
This paper reasserts the fundamental conceptual distinction between language- particular categories ...
pursuing one of the same goals as generative grammar: to determine the limits of pos-sible human lan...
In this online talk, I report on some of the conceptual challenges that arise in creating typologica...
In this article, one of the important branches of linguistics, typology, or rather, comparative typo...