This article critically analyses the Supreme Court’s Miller judgment, taking it as an opportunity to reflect on the true place of EU law in UK law and on the right way to advance legal arguments on that point. It argues that the Miller majority did not provide an adequate answer to two strong arguments regarding interpretation of the European Communities Act 1972. Firstly, to the argument from the time-gap between enactment of the ECA and the moment Community law became directly effective in the UK. Secondly, to the argument from the purpose of s. 1(3) ECA, showing that the 1972 Act was enacted on the assumption of the orthodox dualist model
This article discusses the implementation of Directive 2004/38/EC (the Directive) within the UK’s le...
This article is concerned with whether the concept of a legal system-long a centrepiece of state-bas...
An unprecedented eleven-member UK Supreme Court decided R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting ...
This article critically analyses the Supreme Court’s Miller judgment, taking it as an opportunity t...
The UK Supreme Court’s judgment in Miller renews attention in the sources of law, particularly treat...
This article comments on the recent UK Supreme Court decision on the legality of triggering Article ...
This article analyses the recent decision of the UK Supreme Court determining the UK’s ‘constitution...
his note examines the UK Supreme Court's judgment in the Brexit case, Miller v Secretary of State fo...
The Supreme Court in Miller upheld the Divisional Court, and decided that the government could not t...
The impact of EU membership on the UK constitution has been profound. In the Miller (Article 50) cas...
The authors offer an alternative reading of the judgment R (Miller) v. The Secretary of State for Ex...
The paper examines the reception of European Community law by courts in the United Kingdom. It is co...
In “the constitutional case of the century”, the UK Supreme Court concluded that the Government did ...
In several recent cases the Supreme Court has endorsed the idea that there are some general limits t...
Legal context. The various Acts of Parliament governing UK intellectual property law have been signi...
This article discusses the implementation of Directive 2004/38/EC (the Directive) within the UK’s le...
This article is concerned with whether the concept of a legal system-long a centrepiece of state-bas...
An unprecedented eleven-member UK Supreme Court decided R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting ...
This article critically analyses the Supreme Court’s Miller judgment, taking it as an opportunity t...
The UK Supreme Court’s judgment in Miller renews attention in the sources of law, particularly treat...
This article comments on the recent UK Supreme Court decision on the legality of triggering Article ...
This article analyses the recent decision of the UK Supreme Court determining the UK’s ‘constitution...
his note examines the UK Supreme Court's judgment in the Brexit case, Miller v Secretary of State fo...
The Supreme Court in Miller upheld the Divisional Court, and decided that the government could not t...
The impact of EU membership on the UK constitution has been profound. In the Miller (Article 50) cas...
The authors offer an alternative reading of the judgment R (Miller) v. The Secretary of State for Ex...
The paper examines the reception of European Community law by courts in the United Kingdom. It is co...
In “the constitutional case of the century”, the UK Supreme Court concluded that the Government did ...
In several recent cases the Supreme Court has endorsed the idea that there are some general limits t...
Legal context. The various Acts of Parliament governing UK intellectual property law have been signi...
This article discusses the implementation of Directive 2004/38/EC (the Directive) within the UK’s le...
This article is concerned with whether the concept of a legal system-long a centrepiece of state-bas...
An unprecedented eleven-member UK Supreme Court decided R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting ...