Add to ORKGThe Supreme Court will soon decide if North Carolina’s ban on the use of social networking websites by registered sex offenders is constitutional.1 The case is Packingham v. North Carolina and oral arguments were heard in February 2017. The principal legal issue in the case is whether the ban violates the First Amendment’s right to freedom of speech
The United States Supreme Court has held that a ban on obscene dial-a-porn telephone communications ...
To determine whether punishing the disclosure of illegally obtained information violates the First A...
This Article examines the standard of scrutiny courts should apply when testing the validity of laws...
The Supreme Court will soon decide if North Carolina’s ban on the use of social networking websites...
The United States Supreme Court recently ruled in Packingham v. North Carolina that the state\u27s l...
Readily available on computers, phones, tablets, or television, social media has become a necessary ...
In its decision in Packingham v North Carolina, the Supreme Court of the United States found a North...
The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to issue a landmark decision soon on the ability of government to...
In Bland v. Roberts, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia was prese...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.In 2003, the United States Supreme Court issued...
As of this past Thursday, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked a lower court ruling that prevented ...
Because of the public demand for stronger governmental action against those who commit violent and s...
In early April, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in the case of Biden v. Knight First Amendmen...
Since 1957, the United States Supreme Court has exhibited a marked shift in its attitude toward free...
This Note scrutinizes the constitutionality of statutes that ban sex offenders who are no longer und...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a ban on obscene dial-a-porn telephone communications ...
To determine whether punishing the disclosure of illegally obtained information violates the First A...
This Article examines the standard of scrutiny courts should apply when testing the validity of laws...
The Supreme Court will soon decide if North Carolina’s ban on the use of social networking websites...
The United States Supreme Court recently ruled in Packingham v. North Carolina that the state\u27s l...
Readily available on computers, phones, tablets, or television, social media has become a necessary ...
In its decision in Packingham v North Carolina, the Supreme Court of the United States found a North...
The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to issue a landmark decision soon on the ability of government to...
In Bland v. Roberts, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia was prese...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.In 2003, the United States Supreme Court issued...
As of this past Thursday, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked a lower court ruling that prevented ...
Because of the public demand for stronger governmental action against those who commit violent and s...
In early April, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in the case of Biden v. Knight First Amendmen...
Since 1957, the United States Supreme Court has exhibited a marked shift in its attitude toward free...
This Note scrutinizes the constitutionality of statutes that ban sex offenders who are no longer und...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a ban on obscene dial-a-porn telephone communications ...
To determine whether punishing the disclosure of illegally obtained information violates the First A...
This Article examines the standard of scrutiny courts should apply when testing the validity of laws...