Ronald Dworkin famously argued that legal positivism is a defective account of law because it has no account of Theoretical Disagreement. In this article I argue that legal positivism—as advanced by H.L.A. Hart—does not need an account of Theoretical Disagreement. Legal positivism does, however, need a plausible account of interpretation in law. I provide such an account in this article
Scott Shapiro has recently argued that Ronald Dworkin posed a new objection to legal positivism in L...
Scott Shapiro has recently argued that Ronald Dworkin posed a new objection to legal positivism in L...
This article offers a review of the Hart-Dworkin dispute and a qualified defense of the positivist\u...
In recent years, there has been renewed interest in the question of whether Ronald Dworkin was corre...
Scott Shapiro has recently argued that Ronald Dworkin posed a new objection to legal positivism in L...
Scott Shapiro has recently argued that Ronald Dworkin posed a new objection to legal positivism in L...
Ronald Dworkin's anti-positivist argument from theoretical disagreement (ATD) in Law's Empire (1986)...
In this article, the author argues that H.L.A. Hart's legal positivism is ultimately self-subverting...
Ronald Dworkin’s contributions to legal philosophy have been subject to severe criticism in recent y...
The following article analyzes the dispute between legal philosophers Ronald Dworkin and H.L.A. Hart...
The following article analyzes the dispute between legal philosophers Ronald Dworkin and H.L.A. Hart...
Herbert L.A. Hart New Challenge to Legal Positivism In his lecture, delivered at the Department of...
Ronald Dworkin’s contributions to legal philosophy have been subject to severe criticism in recent y...
In 2014 we celebrate the 20th anniversary of publishing H.L.A. Hart’s ‘Postscript to The Concept of ...
The authors analyze the portions of Shapiro\u2019s primer Legality, which deal with the problem of l...
Scott Shapiro has recently argued that Ronald Dworkin posed a new objection to legal positivism in L...
Scott Shapiro has recently argued that Ronald Dworkin posed a new objection to legal positivism in L...
This article offers a review of the Hart-Dworkin dispute and a qualified defense of the positivist\u...
In recent years, there has been renewed interest in the question of whether Ronald Dworkin was corre...
Scott Shapiro has recently argued that Ronald Dworkin posed a new objection to legal positivism in L...
Scott Shapiro has recently argued that Ronald Dworkin posed a new objection to legal positivism in L...
Ronald Dworkin's anti-positivist argument from theoretical disagreement (ATD) in Law's Empire (1986)...
In this article, the author argues that H.L.A. Hart's legal positivism is ultimately self-subverting...
Ronald Dworkin’s contributions to legal philosophy have been subject to severe criticism in recent y...
The following article analyzes the dispute between legal philosophers Ronald Dworkin and H.L.A. Hart...
The following article analyzes the dispute between legal philosophers Ronald Dworkin and H.L.A. Hart...
Herbert L.A. Hart New Challenge to Legal Positivism In his lecture, delivered at the Department of...
Ronald Dworkin’s contributions to legal philosophy have been subject to severe criticism in recent y...
In 2014 we celebrate the 20th anniversary of publishing H.L.A. Hart’s ‘Postscript to The Concept of ...
The authors analyze the portions of Shapiro\u2019s primer Legality, which deal with the problem of l...
Scott Shapiro has recently argued that Ronald Dworkin posed a new objection to legal positivism in L...
Scott Shapiro has recently argued that Ronald Dworkin posed a new objection to legal positivism in L...
This article offers a review of the Hart-Dworkin dispute and a qualified defense of the positivist\u...
DOI
Add to ORKG