Position of a judge during evidence proceeding in contentious procedure with regard to the practice

The main goal of this master's degree thesis is to provide information about position of a judge during evidence proceeding in contentious procedure with special focus on production of evidence. In the text I often use particular decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic and the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic to demonstrate how theoretical legal institutes are applied in practice. I have decided to choose this topic because I am very interested in judge's profession and its practical aspects especially within evidence proceeding. More reasons for my research are stated in the very first introductory part of my theses. The whole theses is composed of three parts and each of them dealing with different sides of evidence proceeding or position of a judge within the meaning of his rights, duties, activity and also responsibility. Part One generally characterizes evidence proceeding and it makes the foundation for following part that is focused on partial phase of evidence proceeding (i.e. production of evidence). This part is divided into four chapters. The first chapter describes contentious and non-contentious procedure and also gives an explanation of main distinctions between these concepts. The second chapter concerns with basic principles of justice and civil procedure. The..