Chemical Composition and Flexural Strength Discrepancies Between Milled and Lithography-Based Additively Manufactured Zirconia.

PURPOSE To evaluate the chemical composition, flexural strength, and Weibull characteristics of milled and lithography-based additively manufactured (AM) zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS A virtual design of a bar (25×4×2 mm) was completed using a software program. The standard tessellation language file was used to manufacture all the specimens: 3Y-TZP zirconia (Priti multidisc ZrO2 monochrome) milled (M group) and 3Y-TZP zirconia (LithaCon 3Y 210) lithography-based AM (CeraFab System S65 Medical) (AM group) bar specimens (n = 20). The chemical composition of the specimens was determined by using energy dispersive X-ray (EDAX) elemental analysis in a scanning electron microscope. Flexural strength was measured in all specimens using 3-point bend test according to ISO/CD 6872.2 with a universal testing machine (Instron Model 8501). Two-parameter Weibull distribution values were calculated. The Shapiro-Wilk test revealed that the data were normally distributed (p < 0.05). Flexural strength values were analyzed using independent Student's t-test (α = 0.05). RESULTS There were no major chemical composition differences observed between M and AM groups. The AM specimens (1518.9 ± 253.9 MPa) exhibited a significantly higher flexural strength mean value compared to the milled (980.5 ± 130.3 MPa) specimens (DF = 13, T-value = -5.97, p < 0.001). The Weibull distribution presented the highest shape for M specimens (11.49) compared to those of AM specimens (6.95). CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference in the chemical composition of milled and AM zirconia material tested. AM zirconia tested exhibited significantly higher flexural strength compared with the milled zirconia evaluated