Background: Degenerative disc disease is a leading cause of chronic back pain in the aging population in the world. The present study was conducted to assess outcome of posterior dynamic stabilization system in degenerative lumbar diseases. Materials & Methods: 78 patients of degenerative lumbar diseases of both genders were divided into 2 groups of 39 each. Group I patients underwent decompression and implantation of Dynesys and group II patients underwent PLIF. ODI, VAS scores for back pain and leg pain, operation time, blood loss, and complications were compared in both groups. Results: There were 25 males and 14 females in group I and 20 males and 19 females in group II. The operative time (min) was 136.2 in group I and 172.4 in gro...
SummaryPurposeTo assess clinical outcomes and kinematic changes in bridged and adjacent segments aft...
This study evaluated differences in outcome variables between dynamic stabilization adjacent to fusi...
WOS: 000411033200008PubMed ID: 28861198Background: This study compares the clinical and radiological...
INTRODUCTION Dynamic stabilization of the degenerated spine was invented to overcome the negative...
Context: There is an increased interest in stabilization of lumbar spine without fusion as an altern...
Study Design. Prospective clinical study. Objective. This study compares the clinical results of ant...
Objective: To know the impact of the Dynesys system on the functional outcomes in patients with spin...
Following lumbar fusion, adjacent segment degeneration has been frequently reported. Dynamic systems...
Dynamic spinal stabilization aims to reduce some of the problems inherent with traditional fusion. T...
There have been few studies comparing the clinical and radiographic outcomes between the Dynesys dyn...
AIm: To evaluate the efficacy of the rehabilitation protocol on patients with lumbar degenerative di...
Background:The objective of this study is to evaluate the factors influencing the outcome of back pa...
Objective. To evaluate the mechanisms of action and effectiveness of posterior dynamic stabilization...
Objectives: Recently posterior dynamic stabilizations (PDS) are increased in degenerative lumbar dis...
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the change of range of motion (ROM) at the segments within the dynami...
SummaryPurposeTo assess clinical outcomes and kinematic changes in bridged and adjacent segments aft...
This study evaluated differences in outcome variables between dynamic stabilization adjacent to fusi...
WOS: 000411033200008PubMed ID: 28861198Background: This study compares the clinical and radiological...
INTRODUCTION Dynamic stabilization of the degenerated spine was invented to overcome the negative...
Context: There is an increased interest in stabilization of lumbar spine without fusion as an altern...
Study Design. Prospective clinical study. Objective. This study compares the clinical results of ant...
Objective: To know the impact of the Dynesys system on the functional outcomes in patients with spin...
Following lumbar fusion, adjacent segment degeneration has been frequently reported. Dynamic systems...
Dynamic spinal stabilization aims to reduce some of the problems inherent with traditional fusion. T...
There have been few studies comparing the clinical and radiographic outcomes between the Dynesys dyn...
AIm: To evaluate the efficacy of the rehabilitation protocol on patients with lumbar degenerative di...
Background:The objective of this study is to evaluate the factors influencing the outcome of back pa...
Objective. To evaluate the mechanisms of action and effectiveness of posterior dynamic stabilization...
Objectives: Recently posterior dynamic stabilizations (PDS) are increased in degenerative lumbar dis...
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the change of range of motion (ROM) at the segments within the dynami...
SummaryPurposeTo assess clinical outcomes and kinematic changes in bridged and adjacent segments aft...
This study evaluated differences in outcome variables between dynamic stabilization adjacent to fusi...
WOS: 000411033200008PubMed ID: 28861198Background: This study compares the clinical and radiological...