Hahn and Wallsten [3] wrote that net neutrality usually means that broadband service providers charge consumers only once for Internet access, do not favor one content provider over another, and do not charge content providers for sending information over broadband lines to end users." In this paper we study the implications of being non-neutral, particularly by charging the content providers. Using game theoretic tools, we show that by adding the option for the service providers to charge the content providers, not only may the content providers and the internauts suer, but also the access provider's performance degrades
Hahn and Wallsten [1] wrote that network neutrality “usually means that broadband service providers ...
International audienceIn the network neutrality debate, content providers fight against side payment...
We consider a two-sided market model with a monopolistic Internet Service Provider (ISP), network co...
Hahn and Wallsten [3] wrote that net neutrality usually means that broadband service providers charg...
Available electronicallyby Springer since 2011International audienceHahn and Wallsten [7] wrote that...
This paper deals with the hot and sensitive network neutrality debate. It designs a model simultaneo...
International audienceThis paper studies the effects on user welfare of imposing network neutrality,...
International audienceNetwork neutrality has recently been the topic of an important debate, in both...
We model the main arguments of the net neutrality debate in a two-sided market framework with networ...
We model the main arguments of the net neutrality debate in a two-sided market framework with networ...
Session 06 : Network neutrality and regulationInternational audienceRepresentatives of several Inter...
This thesis studies the economic implications of a transition from a neutral to a non-neutral networ...
International audienceNetwork neutrality is the topic of a vivid and very sensitive debate, in both ...
Abstract. Hahn and Wallsten [1] wrote that network neutrality “usu-ally means that broadband service...
International audienceNetwork neutrality has been a very sensitive topic of discussion all over the ...
Hahn and Wallsten [1] wrote that network neutrality “usually means that broadband service providers ...
International audienceIn the network neutrality debate, content providers fight against side payment...
We consider a two-sided market model with a monopolistic Internet Service Provider (ISP), network co...
Hahn and Wallsten [3] wrote that net neutrality usually means that broadband service providers charg...
Available electronicallyby Springer since 2011International audienceHahn and Wallsten [7] wrote that...
This paper deals with the hot and sensitive network neutrality debate. It designs a model simultaneo...
International audienceThis paper studies the effects on user welfare of imposing network neutrality,...
International audienceNetwork neutrality has recently been the topic of an important debate, in both...
We model the main arguments of the net neutrality debate in a two-sided market framework with networ...
We model the main arguments of the net neutrality debate in a two-sided market framework with networ...
Session 06 : Network neutrality and regulationInternational audienceRepresentatives of several Inter...
This thesis studies the economic implications of a transition from a neutral to a non-neutral networ...
International audienceNetwork neutrality is the topic of a vivid and very sensitive debate, in both ...
Abstract. Hahn and Wallsten [1] wrote that network neutrality “usu-ally means that broadband service...
International audienceNetwork neutrality has been a very sensitive topic of discussion all over the ...
Hahn and Wallsten [1] wrote that network neutrality “usually means that broadband service providers ...
International audienceIn the network neutrality debate, content providers fight against side payment...
We consider a two-sided market model with a monopolistic Internet Service Provider (ISP), network co...